OP/ED by Jeremy Steele
When I run out of people who care to listen to me rant facts and opinions on the subject of HIV/AIDS (as it seems I might possibly already have) I will start talking to the wall and explain things there… might not be any worse or less receptive of an audience…
I just read a horrible but still funny joke from my offensive joke book once which which again reminds me of this whole sad AIDS fiasco/sham:
What do you call a gay guy on rollerblades? :
Roll AIDS.
This fucked-up (but funny) joke of course reminds us of the whole notion that AIDS is a gay disease, which also works real well for “religious” people who believe this is God’s wrath. It’s also good for conspiracy theorists who claim it’s a secret campaign by the illuminazis to eliminate “heathens”, “undesirables” and employ population control.
Some theories are sound and useful, other not, or not as much. Even though I’m always open-minded to conspiracy theories that doesn’t mean I’m so open-minded that my brains are falling out.
I don’t consider myself a theorist as much as simply a gatherer or alternative information, but regardless I think everything is a conspiracy, more of less, to some degree… going along to get along is a conspiracy of sorts… but anyways…
With AIDS, however, I think it’s more important to simply go over the basic facts and worry less about theories and such of whether or not a dark gathering of evil lords are behind it. Besides the argument that it’s all a preplanned agenda I think is weaker and less directly self-evident than certain other conspiracy theories but I’m not going to get into that because it really doesn’t matter… Certainly germ and viral hunters have been waiting in the wings to be employed to find a cure for any possible pandemics.
Getting back to sound versus unsound theories, the original theory from doctors before HIV and AIDS was born was that the Kaposi Sarcoma or “Wasting Syndrome” those gays were dying of was a gay disease.
Of course this is a gay disease. In fact molecular biologists have recently isolated the gay gene within the HIV virus. It turns out the AIDS virus
is also a big fan of Liberace and Wham!
But seriously, this is why gays, who for many years have been targeted by authorities which seek to marginalize, change or even eliminate them should’ve been the FIRST ones to question authority, including those doctors and other hired mouths who from the start erroneously labeled this a gay disease, specifically “Gay Related Immune Deficiency”.
Of course I’m sure they did react somewhat in that fashion, taking offense that it was “gay related”, yet at the same time still relying on these doctor’s divine wisdom.
Gays more than anyone should’ve jumped on this shit from the start and screamed in a collective huff “WTF?!?!” Just because this sickness croped up by members of the gay community didn’t make the virus gay. Didn’t anyone within the medical industries and gay community ever stop to think it might be a life-style within the gay lifestyle that was the killer, and not necessarily germ or viral based or reliant, or anything based on being gay, in general?
This GRID label should’ve woken up if not the general population, at least gays in particular. How the fuck where they putting together that these guys are dying because they’re gay? Thus the doctors were saying being gay in itself is causing a disease, not perhaps something else being done by the gays who were dying. Were all gay dying? No. So perhaps it was self-inflicted by means other than being gay!
This is what the very name of the disease called “GRID” was proclaiming How could they have ruled out drug use and/or something they were doing to their bodies, like not eating or sleeping for days, etc?
They never did. They assumed it was because of germs or viruses without any medical back up until Gallo came along with even less medical backup and cooked the books in favor of the theory he’d been pushing in regards to other diseases for years, that it’s viral, or actually retro-virally based.
Let’s assume HIV or AIDS is more easily spread because of anal sex (as an asshole more easily tears than a vagina). Is anal sex something only gays do? My point here is not to suggest gays don’t have more anal sex than women. The point here is how the fuck did doctors have the audacity to call this a “gay related” disease in the first place? It’s an audacious and idiotic insult!
Meanwhile I’ve been told by someone from those
thereabouts that he didn’t know a person who died of Kaposi Sarcoma related AIDS who wasn’t partying for years with “Poppers” or Amyl Nitrate.
Is doing poppers gay? Whatever it was that they were dying from, again the doctors called it a gay disease. And it still is referred to it as a gay disease to this day.
Why has the recreational drug use angle never been explored by this pill and cocktail pushers? Why not just if for nothing else to effectively show that it is not the case, if that were the case? After all, billions and billions (as Carl Sagan never actually said) has been “spent” looking for a cure which they keep telling us is long ways away (how do they know this or is this statement motivated and formulated based on self-interest?)
Again from the start, the writing on the wall suggested that that our holy doctors were just sham-men, not shamen.
kudos to jeremy for the post…
some other interesting facts
women now account for more than half of all HIV cases in the world..
in the U.S out of the top 25 states with the highest number of becoming HIV pos. 18 of those states are in the south.
I read an article yesterday that a vaccine is now ready for human trail.. It kind of scares me because how do you try it on humans?
African American women accounted for 67% of estimated female AIDS cases worldwide in 2004, but only 13% of women with AIDS were of the U.S. population.
Latinas accounted for 15% of estimated AIDS cases, and 14% of the female population.
more on this later… busy now getting busy
In the latest year full stats are available (2006), 73% of all new HIV cases in the USA were men. 69% of new cases were tied to gay sex or IV drug use. Broken down by ethnicity, Black males came in with 40% of the larger male numbers while women came in with 61% of the smaller female numbers. The actual correlation between HIV and AIDS is not as strong as it used to be either but there are definite trends worth watching.
If you have another STD, you are far more infectious to others as well as far more likely to catch HIV.
If you engage in high risk sexual contact, you are far more likely to catch HIV.
If you are poor and have limited access to health care (and this applies anywhere in the world), you are far more likely to catch HIV (hence the disproportionate number of minorities in the US; about half of all new cases are among blacks, that group representing 13% of the population).
the number has risen to 26 percent in the U.S according the CDC latest report done in August 2008
i agree with jeremiah hiv-aids is a fucking scam http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tCGVZ6oWoTA
What’s next, you can give yourself an circumcision w/ a pair of nail clippers? I believe this clown would argue w/ the wall on this topic. After all, it’s the only time he makes a damn bit of sense.
from peaceandlove . ca/AIDSsexmyth . html
Sex has nothing to do with ‘AIDS’
Result of the largest and longest study of the heterosexual transmission of ‘HIV’ in the United States:
We followed 175 HIV-discordant couples over time, for a total of approximately 282 couple-years of follow up […]
We observed no seroconversion after entry into the study.
Padian NS et al. Heterosexual transmission of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) in Northern California: Results from a ten-year study. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1997;146(4):350-7.
David W. Rasnick, PhD, member of the Scientific Group for the Reappraisal of AIDS, also present this study in Sex has nothing to do with AIDS, a letter published by the British Medical Journal
The ‘Prostitute’ Paradox
If ‘AIDS’ (‘HIV’) was sexually transmitted, we should find it in sex-trade workers. The following references, including five studies published in prestigious scientific journals, demonstrate no sexual transmission.
In this study, the authors estimated overall and cause-specific mortality among prostitute women. They recorded information on prostitute women identified by police and health department surveillance in Colorado Springs, Colorado, from 1967 to 1999. The authors assessed cause-specific mortality in this open cohort of 1,969 women […]
Violence and drug use were the predominant causes of death, both during periods of prostitution and during the whole observation period. […] Deaths from acquired immunodeficiency syndrome occurred exclusively among prostitutes who admitted to injecting drug use or were inferred to have a history of it.
Potterat J J et al. Mortality in a Long-term Open Cohort of Prostitute Women. Am J Epidemiol 2004;159:778-785.
During a 36-month period, a multidisciplinary team manned a van that visited the major location of open prostitution in the Tel Aviv area […]
All 128 females who did not admit to drug abuse were seronegative.
A thorough search of recent literature fail to demonstrate unequivocal seropositivity among British, French, German, Italian, or Dutch prostitutes without drug histories.
Modan, B et al. Prevalence of HIV antibodies in transsexual and female prostitutes, American Journal of Public Health. 1992;82(4):590-592.
Michael Wright also report this study in A Former AIDS Researcher Has Second Thoughts, part one: Manufacturing the AIDS Scare.
In order to determine whether prostitutes operating outside of areas of high drug abuse have equally elevated rates of infection, 354 prostitutes were surveyed in Tijuana, Mexico […]
None of the 354 [blood] samples […] was positive for HIV-1 or HIV-2
Condoms were used […] for less than half of their sexual contacts.
Only 4 female prostitutes (1%) admitted to ever having abused intravenous drugs.
Infection with HIV was not found in this prostitute population despite the close proximity to neighboring San Diego, CA, which has a high incidence of diagnosed cases of AIDS, and to Los Angeles, which has a reported 4% prevalence of HIV infection in prostitutes.
Hyams KC et al. HIV infection in a non-drug abusing prostitute population. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases. 1989;21(3):353-4.
David Crowe also report this study in Referenced Quotes about Transmission of HIV and AIDS.
In order to evaluate the frequency of sexual transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) among promiscuous heterosexuals, we studied the prevalence of HIV infection among a group of predominantly Caucasian call girls and women working for escort services and massage parlors in New York City. In the 78 subjects studied, the mean age was 31.6 years and the mean duration of prostitution was 5.1 years. Study participants each had a median of 200 different sexual partners in the preceding year. […]
none of the 72 non-drug-abusers were seropositive for HIV. This study indicates that despite their promiscuity, HIV infection is still uncommon in call girls in New York City
Seidlin M et al. Prevalence of HIV infection in New York call girls. Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes. JAIDS, 1988;1(2):150-4
448 licensed female prostitutes in Nuremburg, West Germany, were studied in March and April 1986.
No prostitute tested was anti-HIV positive […] they had been prostitutes for 77 months on average […] The mean number of clients was 13 per week […]
This heterosexually very active group of women has remained free from HIV infection.
Smith GL, Smith KF. Lack of HIV infection and condom use in licensed prostitutes. Lancet. 1986;1392.
In September, 1985, we collected 56 samples of blood in the rue Saint-Denis, the most notorious street in Paris for prostitution. […]
No prostitute was seropositive.
These women, aged 18-60 have sexual intercourse 15-25 times daily and do not routinely use protection. Although contracting AIDS is greatly feared by these women, only 15 used condoms with all their customers.
[…] none of the Paris prostitute was a drug addict.
Brenky-Faudeux D, Fribourg-Blanc A. HTLV-III antibody in prostitutes. Lancet. 1985;2:1424.
The same results were reported from Amsterdam, one of the world’s centers of legalized prostitution. When several hundred non-drug using prostitutes were studied, investigators found no HIV-positive women even though they averaged more than 200 clients per year
Coutinho RA, van der Helm TH. [No indications for LAV/HTLV-III in non-drug-using prostitutes in Amsterdam]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd, 1986;130(11):508. As presented by David W. Rasnick, PhD, in a letter published by the British Medical Journal Sex has nothing to do with AIDS.
We saw that sexual transmission has not been demonstrated in sex-trade workers. Of course, those who take hard drugs are more likely to become sick, it has nothing to do with ‘HIV’ or ‘AIDS’. Strong drugs have a proven immune suppressive effect, and intravenous drugs injections often carry some foreign proteins, adding an extra burden on the immune system.
*****
No evidence of ‘HIV’ transmission
[Google Answer] has a politically correct answer, to the question of sexual ‘HIV’ Transmission, with the authoritative ‘AIDS science’ pseudo-scientific finish; here is the [edited] comment from Peaceandlove.ca. Of course, do not miss the CDC official answer.
No reliable evidence has ever been presented, for the Sexual Transmission of ‘HIV/AIDS’.
Note that all the references presented […] in the answer, are related to the US Department of Health and Human Services. No objective source.
They have been shaping ‘AIDS science’ ever since the official ‘HIV/AIDS’ proclamation, during the Reagan administration, 1984 April 24th, presented by the US Secretary of Health and Human Services. An international press conference in the National Academy of Sciences auditorium packed with journalists and television crews.
“The journalists reporting this event didn’t notice the telltale signs that there was something fishy about the occasion. An obvious anomaly was that the announcement was made prior to publication of the articles presenting the evidence. A firm rule of scientific publication bans this practice. […]”
The subject of Michael Crichton’s latest book, In State of Fear, is the subversion of science in behalf of sociopolitical agendas. In a recent speech, he said that “the greatest challenge facing mankind is the challenge of distinguishing reality from fantasy, truth from propaganda.”
“some scientists (and increasing numbers, in some fields) have been seduced away from truth-telling into the exciting realms of policy-making and mass persuasion”
In State of Fear, one of the characters tells the hero that “the military-industrial complex is no longer the primary driver of society… For the last 15 years we have been under the control of an entirely new complex, far more powerful and far more pervasive. I call it the politico-legal-media complex … And it is dedicated to promoting fear in the population, under the guise of promoting safety.”
How can a male human contract HIV from a female human, in a detail physiological explanation, during unprotected sexual vaginal intercourse? Google Answer, with a comment by Gilles St-Pierre for PeaceandLove.ca, January 2005.
there has been the assumption in both scientific and lay communities that vaginal HIV transmission does commonly exists, […] the basis for that assumption rests on data that are unacceptably weak or flawed. The need for sexual change that has been claimed by public health and other authorities is not supported by the scientific data
Brody S, Lack of Evidence for Transmission of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Through Vaginal Intercourse, Archives of Sexual Behavior 1995;24(4): 383-393.
Stuart Brody, Professor of Medical Psychology at the University of Tubingen, Germany, also wrote Sex at risk, Transaction Publishers, 1997, 222 pages. Sex at Risk is a review of the scientific literature dealing with the transmission of AIDS. Like Michael Fumento’s The Myth of Heterosexual AIDS, it exposes the mythology surrounding vaginal intercourse and AIDS transmission.
“Nobody wants to look at the facts about the disease. It’s the most extraordinary thing I’ve ever seen. I’ve sent countless letters to medical journals pointing out the epidemiological discrepancies and they simply ignore them . . .
this whole heterosexual AIDS thing is a hoax.”
Dr Gordon Stewart, emeritus professor of epidemiology, University of Glasgow, and former AIDS advisor to the World Health Organisation, as quoted by Professor Hiram Caton in AIDS Mania, a charisma of hoax,1995.
Epidemiological Evidence against Heterosexual Transmission of HIV, by Christian Fiala M.D. 2000.
Safe Sex Notice
Of course, people everywhere should be encouraged to behave more thoughtfully in their sexual lives. They should be provided with reliable counseling about condom use, contraception, family planning and venereal diseases. But whether in Cameroon or California, sex education must no longer be distorted by terrifying, dubious misinformation that equates sex with death.
Writing about the African AIDS hoax, this is the conclusion of the article Myths of AIDS and Sex, by Charles L. Geshekter, New African, October 1994.
Dr. Charles L. Geshekter is a professor of African history at the California State University, Chico.
What about Africa ? Sex has nothing to do with it.
Overall, 35% of Africa’s children are at higher risk of death than they were 10 years ago. Every hour, more than 500 African mothers lose a small child. In 2002, more than four million African children died. […]
Mostly, death comes in familiar garb. The main causes among children are depressingly recognizable: the perinatal conditions closely associated with poverty; diarrhea diseases; pneumonia and other lower respiratory tract conditions; and malaria. [It has nothing to do with ‘AIDS’, these were also common 50 years ago.]
WHO, The World Health Report 2003.
Notes from the conference AIDS in Africa, December 8th 2003, in the European Parliament.
Nutritional AIDS dominates the scene in South Africa today as indeed it did during Apartheid. In the middle 50’s and 60’s, 50% of black children were dead before the age of 5. The causes of death were recorded as: PNEUMONIA, HIGH FEVER, DEHYDRATION and intractable DIARRHOEA due to protein deficiency.
Today, these clinical features are called AIDS. Today in South Africa, TB is the leading cause of death and morbidity amongst Africans, but this is called AIDS.
In conclusion, NUTRITIONAL AIDS is a direct result of Apartheid in association with capitalist iatrogenesis – hence the shacks (favelas), lack of sanitation, lack of clean drinking water, unemployment and destitution.
Prof. Sam Mhlongo, MD, Chief Specialist Family Physician & Head of The Department of Family Medicine at The Medical University of Southern Africa; Member of the South African Presidential AIDS Advisory Panel, South Africa.
In Tanzania, the population of the Kagera region, epicenter of AIDS 15 years ago, hasn’t ceased growing since then, ie with a 53% increase between 1988 and 2002.
The demographic catastrophe expected as a result of the ‘deadliest epidemic in history’ did not materialize, on the contrary. Yet, no real, concrete anti-viral measures were applied in the region. The only explanations for this lie in the improvement in the economic conditions and in development aid. An example of a global approach to development is found in the NGO, Partage Tanzania.
While the experts, with their statistics, would have one believe that there exists an extremely serious HIV/AIDS epidemic, no trace of an epidemic is observable in the field. All that can be seen is a very poor, under-nourished population suffering from malaria, endemic immunodeficiency and common illnesses.
Tanzania, Kagera Region, epicentre of AIDS 15 years ago: Present situation, by Marc Deru, MD and Nutritionist, Member of the Group for the Scientific Reappraisal of AIDS, Belgium.
———-
During the 1990s HIV propagated rapidly in Zimbabwe, increasing at an estimated rate of 12% annually. At the same time, the overall sexually transmitted infections (STI) burden declined an estimated 25% […] while there was a parallel increase in reported condom use by high-risk persons (prostitutes, lorry drivers, miners, and young people).
This example frames the problem: why would a relatively low efficiency sexually transmitted virus like HIV outrun more efficiently transmitted STI? In the notable four-cities study, many common sexual risk factors linked to HIV transmission (eg, high rate of partner change, sex with prostitutes, and low condom use) were not correlated with HIV prevalence
Brewer DD, Brody S, et al. Mounting anomalies in the epidemiology of HIV in Africa: cry the beloved paradigm, International Journal of STD & AIDS 2003; 14: 144 – 147
That is one of the David Gisselquist group papers alluded to later in this page.
———-
Abstract of a thorough review of the situation of “AIDS” in Africa:
AIDS in Africa: Distinguishing Fact and Fiction, E. Papadopulos-Eleopulos (1) Valendar F. Turner (2) John M. Papadimitriou (3) Harvey Bialy (4), World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology, 1995;11:135-143
(1) Department of Medical Physics, The Royal Perth Hospital, Western Australia; (2) Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital; (3) Department of Pathology, University of Western Australia; (4) Bio/Technology
The data widely purporting to show the existence and heterosexual transmission in Africa of a new syndrome caused by a retrovirus which induces immune deficiency is critically evaluated. It is concluded that both acquired immune deficiency (AID) and the symptoms and diseases which constitute the clinical syndrome S) are long standing in Africa, affect both sexes equally and are caused by factors other than HIV. The presence of positive HIV serology in Africans represents no more than cross-reactivity caused by an abundance of antibodies induced by the numerous infectious and parasitic diseases which are endemic in Africa, that is, a positive HIV antibody test does not prove HIV infection. Given the above, one would expect to find a high prevalence of “AIDS” and “HIV” antibodies in Africa. This is not proof of heterosexual transmission of either HIV or AIDS.
Here are the last sentences in the conclusion of this review:
More rationally, one might choose to agree with those African physicians and scientists including Richard and Rosalind Chirimuuta (Chirimuuta & Chirimuuta, 1987) who believe that immunosuppression and certain symptoms and diseases which constitute African AIDS have existed in Africa since time immemorial. According to Professor P.A.K. Addy, Head of Clinical Microbiology at the University of Science and Technology in Kumasi, Ghana “Europeans and Americans came to Africa with prejudiced minds, so they are seeing what they wanted to see… I’ve known for a long time that Aids is not a crisis in Africa as the world is being made to understand. But in Africa it is very difficult to stick your neck out and say certain things.
The West came out with those frightening statistics on Aids in Africa because it was unaware of certain social and clinical conditions. In most of Africa, infectious diseases, particularly parasitic infections, are common. And there are other conditions that can easily compromise or affect one’s immune system” (Hodgkinson, 1994). In the words of Dr. Konotey-Ahulu from the Cromwell Hospital in London, “Today, because of AIDS, it seems that Africans are not allowed to die from these conditions [from which they used to die before the AIDS era] any longer. …Why do the world’s media appear to have conspired with some scientists to become so gratuitously extravagant with the untruth?” (Konotey-Ahulu, 1987)
Articles about AIDS in Africa on the VirusMyth AIDS Web site.
The Truth about Aids in Africa, by Jeff Kaplan.
CDC, UNAIDS and WHO deceptive positions
How exactly *is* HIV transmitted? The Official answer:
From “HIV and Its Transmission”, a CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, an agency of the USA Department of Health and Human Services) fact sheet:
(Last Updated: September 22, 2003)
Research has revealed a great deal of valuable medical, scientific, and public health information about the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). The ways in which HIV can be transmitted have been clearly identified. Unfortunately, false information or statements that are not supported by scientific findings continue to be shared widely through the Internet or popular press. Therefore, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has prepared this fact sheet to correct a few misperceptions about HIV.
How HIV is Transmitted
HIV is spread by sexual contact with an infected person, by sharing needles and/or syringes (primarily for drug injection) with someone who is infected, or, less commonly […]
CDC is committed to providing the scientific community and the public with accurate and objective information about HIV infection and AIDS. It is vital that clear information on HIV infection and AIDS be readily available to help prevent further transmission of the virus and to allay fears and prejudices caused by misinformation.
——–
Government-nurtured fear of AIDS, achieving pro-family goals
Though scientists and anti-AIDS activists knew that the government-nurtured fear of AIDS among upscale, non-drug-using heterosexuals was exaggerated, not everyone thought this was a bad thing. Indeed, many credited rampant fear with achieving pro-family goals that no amount of moralizing alone could have accomplished. […]
“I don’t see that much downside in slightly exaggerating [AIDS risk]” says John Ward, chief of the CDC branch that keeps track of AIDS cases. “Maybe they’ll wear a condom. Maybe they won’t sleep with someone they don’t know.”
AIDS Fight is Skewed by Federal Campaign Exaggerating Risks, Wall Street Journal, May 1, 1996. Cover story, by Amanda Bennett and Anita Sharpe, staff reporters.
—————-
Notes from a discussion at the conference AIDS in Africa, December 8th 2003 in the European Parliament, with Stuart BRODY, PhD, Clinical Psychologist, University of Tubingen, Germany.
Dr. Brody is a member of the David Gisselquist group that has published several papers during the last year questioning sexual and vertical transmission of HIV/AIDS in Africa. The group has suggested that medical or iatrogenic transmission through unclean injections in Africa may be the explanation for “HIV infections” in the continent.
With the intent of censoring their views, UNAIDS and WHO held a meeting with these researchers in March, 2003, and released a declaration stating: “An expert group has reaffirmed that unsafe sexual practices are responsible for the vast majority of HIV infections in sub-Saharan Africa, and that safer sex promotion must remain the primary feature of prevention programs in the region.”
The Official WHO and UNAIDS statement (where the experts remain anonymous):
Expert group stresses that unsafe sex is primary mode of transmission of HIV in Africa. WHO and UNAIDS Expert Group Statement, 14 March 2003. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2003
A reply from the David Gisselquist group has been published in the Science’s AIDS Prevention and Vaccine Research Site, here is the introduction:
The belief that sex is the primary mode of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission in sub-Saharan Africa is an assertion so widely accepted and has remained unquestioned for so long that it has taken on the status of a received truth.
The World Health Organization (WHO) and the Joint U.N. Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) recently convened an expert consultation to review issues raised in a series of papers published in the International Journal of STD & AIDS (1 -4) that questioned the validity of that assertion. After examining the papers, WHO and UNAIDS issued a press release announcing that “the vast majority of evidence [supports the view] that unsafe sexual practices continue to be responsible for the overwhelming majority of infections” (5). As co-authors of the controversial articles (1 -4), and as participants in the Geneva meeting (three of us), we state that WHO’s conclusion is premature. It is neither based on those discussions, nor on a more considered review of the relevant literature.
Gisselquist D, Potterat JJ, et al, Examining the hypothesis that sexual transmission drives Africa’s HIV epidemic, AIDScience, 2003;3(10).
ABC approach to behaviour change
In 2001, the United Nations General Assembly Special Session (UNGASS) endorsed the ABC approach to preventing HIV infection. The ABC approach to behaviour change gives three clear messages for preventing the transmission of HIV.
ABC stands for: Abstain from having sexual relations or, for youth, delay having sex; Be faithful to one uninfected partner; and use Condoms consistently and correctly.
State of world population 2003 report, United Nations Population Fund.
Political Disease
We were moving toward a more feeling, freer society
I rank the publicizing of AIDS right up there with the atomic bomb as events that impacted our culture for the worse. We were moving toward a more feeling, freer society until AIDS
Jack Nicholson, actor in 58 movies, with 12 Oscar nominations and 3 statuettes, Playboy interview, January 2004, 50th anniversary issue.
AIDS is not just another disease. […]
It is the ultimate triumph of politics over science.
Michael Fumento, The Myth of Heterosexual AIDS, 1990. Michael Fumento, author, journalist, and attorney specializing in science and health issues, is a former AIDS analyst for the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.
AIDS is the most political disease of our age.
By 1987, media reporting on AIDS and safe sex education had penetrated the consciousness of most sexually active men and women. The US Surgeon General summed up the effects of the massive campaign by declaring that “AIDS has killed the sexual revolution”
Hiram Caton, The Aids Mirage. Professor Hiram Caton (1995) is Head of the School of Applied Ethics at Griffith University, Queensland, and a Fellow of the Australian Institute of Biology.
Everybody’s not doing it. That’s the word from Newsweek, The Atlantic, and other trend watchers: Couples are having less sex these days than even in the famously uptight ’50s. Why? Busy, exhausting lives is the easy answer. But how Americans view eroticism in the wake of recent sexual and social revolutions may be an even bigger factor, according to a growing number of researchers and social observers.
Introduction to the cover story “In search of Erotic Intelligence”, Utne Reader, September / October 2003.
*****
Has nothing to do with Science
“The HIV hypothesis ranks with the ‘bad air’ theory for malaria and the ‘bacterial infection’ theory of beriberi and pellagra [caused by nutritional deficiencies]. It is a hoax that became a scam.” (Sunday Times (London) 3 April 1994)
Dr. Bernard Forscher, former editor of the U.S. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences
The first casualty of the ‘war on AIDS’ was the integrity of science. The exact moment of the crime can be pinpointed: it was the April 1984 press conference where the then Health Secretary Margaret Heckler declared that government scientist Robert C. Gallo had discovered the viral cause of AIDS. […] Heckler hailed the discovery as ‘yet another miracle for American medicine and science’ and a ‘victory over a dreaded disease’. If smoke and mirror tricks are miracles, then miracle it was. […] Neither Gallo nor the [Pasteur] Institute proved that the virus was pathogenic. Indeed, they did not even isolate it, as the Pasteur Institute chief later admitted. But the spin-doctors at the National Institutes of Health had organized leading journals to endorse Secretary Heckler’s ‘miracle’ with the seal of Science. From that moment, all AIDS research and policy were based on a speculation converted to dogma by bureaucratic power.
This initial public execution of scientific integrity unleashed a propaganda machine that expands Heckler’s initial obvious whopper (‘victory over a dreaded disease’) into a never-ending sickness saga that extorts money and grinds millions into the muck of bad medicine.
Scientific integrity was murdered by a brutal health fascism. The next victim was the gold standard of clinical evaluation, the double blind trial. With a perversity that spin doctors must admire, the methodology was abandoned in the name of ethics! In reality, the double blind trial had to be murdered because it placed the treatment and causality dogmas of AIDS science at grave risk of falsification. The next victim was the integrity of independent clinical judgment. Any doctor who bucked the official line placed himself at risk of retaliation. And […] the fundamental right of informed consent and right to refuse treatment were also murdered.
[…] ‘AIDS science’ is 90% mindless repetition and 10% deeply inconsistent findings of no clinical value.
Hiram Caton, Coming to Grips with Health Fascism, VirusMyth . net, April 1999
Hiram Caton, PhD, is a Fellow at the National Institute of Law, Ethics, and Public Affairs at Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.
In America, we have this thing called “acceptable risk”. In the minds of most Americans, the gay can die and no one cares. The smaller amount of straight individuals that get is, they consider an acceptable risk.
What they don’t take into account is the fact that many people who get this disease were innocent bystanders. Meaning they slept with someone who was high risk but they didn’t know that person was high risk. How is that possibly acceptable??
Very similar to our porn situation here now. Most performers assume that the male talents are straight when in reality, many of them are bisexual. I have solid sources that several of the male talents in Porn Valley today are having unprotected sex with other men and then performing with women. Everyone in Porn Valley knows who they are. They don’t “out” them because so many of them are them!!!!
Even your former agent Desi?
Thanks for the video El G! Excellent!
Happy Independence Day everyone. Let’s remember what our founding fathers fought and died for and never give up the fight ourselves… and let’s free our minds from the manacles that have been forged on us.
If our minds are not free, we are not free.
desi w …go back to your hooker ranch you pimp dennis hof is gonna slap you and your daughter if you dont sell you old melted pussy for a few $$
Heya, Jeremiah was a Bullfrog!
Give yourself a Golden Shower!
“entranced parrot” has spoken!
LC LC LC LC LC LC LC LC LC LC