I went to lasd.org and searched inmate information. I put in her real name Laura Meeae Thompson.
I found this information but I don’t know what it means:
It says she had a custody release on August 9, 2007 from the Central California’s Women’s Facility. Then it says that the CA Dept. of Corrections has a hold for her.
I believe this means she will be in prison for at least a year.
Lee says: "Yeah, a "hold" from DOC would normally indicate she is going back to prison. Note, that sometimes due to overcrowding, a person can be processed and released very quickly."
…poor Lucy, sounds like she’s headed back to the Big House.
Big Lee
Poor Lucy is right. She is such great girl. Its Just not right what has happened to her.
Maybe a letter to the state boss Arnie would be in order and get a bit of a petition going? A pardon from Arnie?
Where are her friends now I wonder? She needs them now more than ever.
Martin, why don´t you join a prision pen pal program. Maybe she will marry you in the end.
Well why would you think my interest was of that nature? Funny assumption? firstly I don’t think I would or could ever have any physical relationship with anyone who has worked in the porn biz, and seen as poor Lucy has done over 400 scenes and goodness only knows how many men through “escorting” etc etc I don’t think there is a snowballs chance in hell of me ever wanting to be involved with her in the way you are thinking.
I just think she is a bit of a fuced up person like ALL porn workers [all who claim otherwise are delusional] and has clearly had a few bad breaks in life which in the end sees her banged up in jail when little good can come of that?
She happens from any info I have been able to gather a pretty decent person behind all the madness.
As to what objection there is with being with a woman who has sucked and fucked more men than I have had fillet steaks? Well its simple enough really. not so much a moral as a medical judgment. I will explain in a few minutes.
All human civilizations and society to a greater or lesser extent have frowned upon or shown disdain for women [yes especially women as opposed to men] who have been less than virginal or in any way promiscuous. Often society has evolved ever more sophisticated ways to pressure people into conforming within certain norms. For example – incest is taboo as are a whole list of other sexual activities. There are many logical reasons for this. In the case of sex, morality becomes intertwined with moral fiber and character. This is because it is such a powerful force and element of the human condition.
The problem however is that sex is essentially dirty! yes while we might laugh at the stupid attitudes of former generations as being backward etc etc, they nevertheless were on to something! They then confused or over emphasized the moral component of this equation resulting in all manner of dogmatic assumptions and judgments about peoples character based solely on their sexuality or displays of it.
Sex simply is dirty and it is that risk which makes it only logical and simple that in simple evolutionary terms it is dangerous to be over active or promiscuous ESPECIALLY FOR WOMEN because aside from being the mother of children and the ones who get stuck with a bun in the oven they are far more likely to catch a STD from men than vice versa.
Obviously if you catch such STDS your health may be compromised and your gene value is thus compromised and devalued. Therefore as a natural restraint, society has developed natural control mechanisms such as DISDAIN for those who put themselves outside of what is generally deemed the norm or acceptable.
It is regarded as reckless and risky to the point of showing poor or low character for a woman to put herself in such a position as to be exposed to so many different sexual partners- and thus STDs. It can effect their own fertility and as women are more emotional creatures than men [generally] it can also have dire consequences on the mental health or sense of well being for women to be involved in such overtly promiscuous conduct/activities. Even men would have many problems with fucing countless numbers of women without it having an emotional consequence. Fact is that sex by its nature cannot be reduced to being just another commodity or “service”
Desire – lust or a need to bond cannot be removed from the human condition or faked very well. So there is always some level of conflict within the minds of women who involve themselves in a world of prostitution or excessive sexual activity.
Regardless of how a woman in the porn biz, or more clearly defined sex trade/prostitution, may protest about liking what she does or so on and so forth, this comes down to conditioning and humans can rationalize almost anything. Ideally sex wouldn’t have a price but of course we being the creatures we are, well we tend to get distracted or lazy. Porn is always bad and the whole industry built upon it is indeed both morally bad but also bad for society in general. Then again it is a part of out nature to have a fascination with it too so it will always be around in some form or other. Plus porn and the whole industry is but on of many far more harmful aspects of our society and is the price we pay for all the other good things that come with the freedoms we have to express ourselves. In other words it is really not that important or too big of a priority for us to change or eradicate it. That said we should not make the mistake of saying it is fine and ok either. We can tolerate it but that should never be the same as promoting as having any virtue on a balance sheet of good and bad.
testy
All human civilizations and society to a greater or lesser extent have frowned upon or shown disdain for women [yes especially women as opposed to men] who have been less than virginal or in any way promiscuous. Often society has evolved ever more sophisticated ways to pressure people into conforming within certain norms.
Before birth control became available to a larger population it was not possible to differentiate between sexual activity and procreation – that’s why all those strict rules were in place. Spreading sperm is free, but getting pregnant and raising a child was a large cost to society. Nowadays we are writing new rules, based on changed realities.
Ah yes BUT! I was going to add:
For example – incest is taboo as are a whole list of other sexual activities. There are many logical reasons for this. In the case of sex, morality becomes intertwined with moral fiber and character. This is because it is such a powerful force and element of the human condition.
The problem however is that sex is essentially dirty! yes while we might laugh at the stupid attitudes of former generations as being backward etc etc, they nevertheless were on to something! They then confused or over emphasized the moral component of this equation resulting in all manner of dogmatic assumptions and judgments about peoples character based solely on their sexuality or displays of it.
Sex simply is dirty and it is that risk which makes it only logical and simple that in simple evolutionary terms it is dangerous to be over active or promiscuous ESPECIALLY FOR WOMEN because aside from being the mother of children and the ones who get stuck with a bun in the oven they are far more likely to catch a STD from men than vice versa.
Obviously if you catch such STDS your health may be compromised and your gene value is thus compromised and devalued. Therefore as a natural restraint, society has developed natural control mechanisms such as DISDAIN for those who put themselves outside of what is generally deemed the norm or acceptable.
It is regarded as reckless and risky to the point of showing poor or low character for a woman to put herself in such a position as to be exposed to so many different sexual partners- and thus STDs. It can effect their own fertility and as women are more emotional creatures than men [generally] it can also have dire consequences on the mental health or sense of well being for women to be involved in such overtly promiscuous conduct/activities.
Even men would have many problems with fucing countless numbers of women without it having an emotional consequence. Fact is that sex by its nature cannot be reduced to being just another commodity or “service”
Desire – lust or a need to bond cannot be removed from the human condition or faked very well. So there is always some level of conflict within the minds of women who involve themselves in a world of prostitution or excessive sexual activity.
Regardless of how a woman in the porn biz, or more clearly defined sex trade/prostitution, may protest about liking what she does or so on and so forth, this comes down to conditioning and humans can rationalize almost anything. Ideally sex wouldn’t have a price but of course we being the creatures we are, well we tend to get distracted or lazy. Porn is always bad and the whole industry built upon it is indeed both morally bad but also bad for society in general.
Then again it is a part of out nature to have a fascination with it too so it will always be around in some form or other. Plus porn and the whole industry is but on of many far more harmful aspects of our society and is the price we pay for all the other good things that come with the freedoms we have to express ourselves. In other words it is really not that important or too big of a priority for us to change or eradicate it. That said we should not make the mistake of saying it is fine and ok either. We can tolerate it but that should never be the same as promoting as having any virtue on a balance sheet of good and bad.
To say that porn is bad is too obvious and simplistic of course. Mc Donalds are bad as are fizzy drinks! if you see what I mean. Now porn is more harmful because its effects are hidden. In saying that I am not on a crusade to get rid of it or demean the people who do it. Rather I just say that in an ideal world it would not even exist. As there will never be an “ideal world” we have to deal with the reality that faces us and that includes all manner of problems or bad things of which porn is just one. How big or harmful it is on a societal scale is not so clear?
certainly it literally ruins or stains the lives of many [especially women] but as with drugs the problem is people. People have problems and porn or drugs are mere symptoms.
In the case of Lucy Lee [this threads topic]
In the case of Lucy Lee well without knowing her personally it is clear that she is actually a bright person who just didn’t have a great start in life and went off the rails at a young age. Thereafter she was liable to be in trouble one way or another.
the tragedy being that what she has done being no way near a match with the price she is now paying by being locked up.
The famed American judicial system is a bit too close to a third world country, but then it has unique reasons for this state of affairs being the case.
Compared with other developed countries the USA is decidedly backward in some areas. But as I say there are good historical reasons why this has come about. Dont forget that it was not all that long ago that there was slavery! and more recently social apartheid in the southern states. No coincidence then that the percentage of black men locked up is way off the scale as a percent.
…MartinNyms, your Passion or DisPassion for Lucy seem peculiar to me. Also, that You are obviously a very Fucked Up person. Fuck You Sir.
Big Lee
“‚ĶMartinNyms, your Passion or DisPassion for Lucy seem peculiar to me. Also, that You are obviously a very Fucked Up person. Fuck You Sir.”
What a peculiar response?
Clearly another inarticulate fool whose zenith of intellect is “fuck you sir” and of course, you are “fucked up”
The astute observer will however have noted that in all the posts here by me [I couldn’t do them all at once becauseof limitations allowed for length of text.) Almost none have dealt with Lucy Lee directly.
She happens to have caught my attention in the same way as one had seen a car crash in slow motion. What is annoying is to see the sheer malice of so many people who should be better placed than most to have SOME sympathy or empathy for her plight but instead can only bad mouth her and or display no sense of human interest or compassion.
This thread had evolved into a more general discussion- or so I had thought/hoped?
…perhaps you’d prefer “martin nyms..the missives of an Idiot”
Vanessa, you are often the voice of reason in XPT despite de fact of you being a trannie, and you do take the harasment like a man. But this time you are wrong. The fact is that social rules evolved by millions of years of evolution and cultural adaptation. The emotional estructures of men and women are in many ways innate and cannot be changed despite medical advances like birth control or antibiotics. Studies in lesser primates have determined that exchanging sex for favors and food is donde by females in the botton of those societies. And like human whores, the females who do that suffer more emotional problems, get sick more often, their offspring is more likely to be abused and have a shorter life spam that other females of their species. Just like most human whores.
Melissa Farley might be a inflammatory clown but as a researcher she proved by the first time the links between certain mental diseases and sexwork. Since that other researchers have proven some of her methods faulty but her conclusions stand, having sex for a living will make most women mentally ill. This is a fact that will not go away.
Now Mr Nyms, other that use Luke is Back as a wailing wall, what will you do? You have expresed your distaste of religion in the past but right now the only people that might help your damisel in distress are faith based organisations.
“perhaps you‚Äôd prefer ‚Äúmartin nyms..the missives of an Idiot‚Äù
SO the best you can do is name calling?
Just what the world need alright.
Another inarticulate fool with nothing good to say.
“Now Mr Nyms, other that use Luke is Back as a wailing wall, what will you do? You have expresed your distaste of religion in the past but right now the only people that might help your damisel in distress are faith based organisations.”
Religion is fine and good so long as people keep it to themselves or in their own homes.
People are free to believe in any sort of superstition they like.
As for “faith based organizations” well I am have no doubt they do many good things but that has nothing t do with much of anything.
Good can be done for its own sake without reference to some hocus pocus nonsense like Christianity , Islam or Judasism They are all quite clearly nonsense – but with very long tradition’s attached to them. Some of which a re fine and noble most of which are just absurd infantile fantasy thinking.
As for “my” damisel in distress? Well I dont know exactly how I could help or make a positive difference but yes I would even be so bold as to say that I would be willing to help if there is something I can do?
Wouldnt most people welcome the chance to help another human being in some meaningful way and even more so if it is a stranger?
The reward being the knowledge that good things can and do happen and that people can raise themselves above the usual impulses of greed etc etc
What the world needs now…sweet love
It’s the only thing that there’s just too little of.
What the world needs now is love, sweet love,
No not just for some but for everyone.
we don’t need another mountain,
There are mountains and hillsides enough to climb
There are oceans and rivers enough to cross,
Enough to last till the end of time.
Lets really be crazy and simply wish out fellow man well.
..Ok Martin. Try to get some Help !
Help help! Im being repressed
Could you please explain what you mean with “despite de fact of you being a trannie”? Do you mean it like, this man sounds intelligent despite the fact that he is black? Or this man is generous despite being Jewish? Is that where you come from?
By the way I also just wanted to note that we are up to post number 32 now in this thread.
Actually that last post was 33 so we are up to 34 now as a result of this comment by me.
Does anyone have any new info on Lucy Lee? I understand she’s still being held at the Calif Correctional Facility for Women in Chowchilla.Anyone know when she’s going to be released?
Folks, are any of you serious about wanting to help Lucy Lee i.e. inmate # X01911?
If so: I would like to help start an effort to obtain a Governor’s pardon for her.
Step 1.
Someone needs to obtain a “pardon packet” from the Gov’s legal affairs office:
Legal Affairs
Office of Gov
State Capitol
SAC, CA 95814
The request for the packet must offer some justification.
Step 2:
Presumably we will need to obtain signatures e.g. using an online form. She has many fans so this ought to be easy.
What do you people think?
While some debate the merits of putting Lucy behind bars, the fact remains that the USA has become a police state. It’s putting people in prison not because it helps them, or helps society. Perhaps it has something to do with the profits that private prison companies and prison guard unions are making off of incarcerating Americans. Perhaps something more sinister is afoot.
Read this:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4858580.stm
And this:
http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7622
Did she owned you money?
The Governator has said he plans to let 22,000 of California’s prisoners out early. This is entirely appropriate since the USA has the highest incarceration rate in the world.
With a little nudging, Arnold could possibly be persuaded to include Lucy in that release. It doesn’t benefit society to have her locked up.
No, she didn’t owe me money. Good joke!
Speaking of money, think about the numbers:
If it costs taxpayers $35k per year to keep her locked up, that is a big loss for taxpayers. And she isn’t paying taxes while in the clink.
If she’s out and working however, she’s paying taxes and contributing to the economy by increasing porn sales, and contributing in a positive way to our popular culture.