Lockwood Is Right

I got this email:

My name is Jeff Hudis and I’ve been doing stories and interviews for Fox Magazine since the late 90’s and am currently the "west coast editor". I have been on a huge number of porn sets and have seen the phenomenon that Kurt Lockwood describes get worse and worse. The predominance of the "porn hooker" profile in the industry has increased in direct proportion to the amount said "pro" can make per scene. There is no other industry in the world where a high school dropout from a trailer park in Arkansas can pull down $5,000/week or more no problem as long as her physical appearance is within an acceptable latitude (sometimes even that’s up for argument) and her pussy and/or ass can take the workout.

 

In the old days if you decided you wanted to become a porn star there was the assumption that you at least had to like sex enough, or be fetishistic or libertine enough to take the whole process public. Nina Hartley once said that the two personality traits common to porn performers were dual penchants for exhibitionism and voyeurism. Now that girls can make anywhere from like $800-$1500 per scene depending on the acts performed the business incentive has finally triumphed over any less understandable motives.

 

With increasing frequency, the pre-scene "do’s and don’ts" meeting between male and female talent has become a buzzkill of regulations coming from the girl. On a recent shoot I heard the male talent comment, "Do you even like to fuck?" after getting her "list". She wasn’t allowing anything other than the vaginal penetration, including kissing. Sexy huh? Knowing that setting up a more adversarial atmosphere than necessary between himself and the girl would only make matters worse he did his best to turn it into a joke and she eventually completed the scene with a minimum of involvement, got paid and split off into the Encino afternoon, quite possibly to another porn house nearby where she would repeat the process with another well known (or less well known) porn stunt cock. The sexual interlude had all the expressiveness of filling your tank at the gas pump. Nice payday though. The checks from those soulless $1000 sex scenes can add up. Fucking duh.

 

The girls that \nKurt Lockwood mentioned and a slew of others (we all know who they are and they \nknow who they are) who actually love to fuck and are true sexual athletes will \nalways bring it home because on some level they want to be there. I have \nseen girls sent packing from a shoot who couldn’t even phone it in enough to \nfake their way through the lameness. The lameness can be amazing and legendary.

 

I don’t want to in \nany way imply that porn girls don’t earn their money. A girl before a scene \nreminds me of a UFC competitor before climbing into the ring or a bull in the \npen at a rodeo. It’s time to throw down. That’s the drill. They’re there to \nget pounded by cock and penetrated every which way and then are usually required \nto take one or more loads of stranger jizz in the face at the very least. That’s \nthe deal. That’s the show.

 

The idea of porn \nbeing that people having sex are being watched, and therein lies the turn-on \ncontinues to be further denatured by this growing occurance and made into \nsomething with the erotic gravity of twinkies. If you want to get off watching \npeople fuck, in a lot of cases you might do better to locate a marginally shot, \namateur video with people who are really into each other. Such a strange \nconcept. You could also check out some porn with girls who actually, \non some level enjoy being there. The cookie cutter sex scene is turning out to \nbe more the rule than the exception. It’s the exceptions that keep it \nsomehow, real.

 

The girls that Kurt Lockwood mentioned and a slew of others (we all know who they are and they know who they are) who actually love to fuck and are true sexual athletes will always bring it home because on some level they want to be there. I have seen girls sent packing from a shoot who couldn’t even phone it in enough to fake their way through the lameness. The lameness can be amazing and legendary.

 

I don’t want to in any way imply that porn girls don’t earn their money. A girl before a scene reminds me of a UFC competitor before climbing into the ring or a bull in the pen at a rodeo. It’s time to throw down. That’s the drill. They’re there to get pounded by cock and penetrated every which way and then are usually required to take one or more loads of stranger jizz in the face at the very least. That’s the deal. That’s the show.

 

The idea of porn being that people having sex are being watched, and therein lies the turn-on continues to be further denatured by this growing occurance and made into something with the erotic gravity of twinkies. If you want to get off watching people fuck, in a lot of cases you might do better to locate a marginally shot, amateur video with people who are really into each other. Such a strange concept. You could also check out some porn with girls who actually, on some level enjoy being there. The cookie cutter sex scene is turning out to be more the rule than the exception. It’s the exceptions that keep it somehow, real.

One thought on “Lockwood Is Right

  1. Oh yeah, they love to fuck and not love to fuck for money. I’m sure if they could get the money for not fucking they’d do that, ya know? BUt it’s like shit fucking is a way easier job than any real job, ya know?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

TrafficHolder.com - Buy & Sell Adult Traffic