Allison Samuels writes in her new book:
Both Denise and Diahn say they’ve stripped at parties for both black and white clients and maintain the attitudes are much more different than people might expect. "When it’s a group of all white men, drunk and young, they really get aggressive and lose it," says Denise. "I also think they have less respect for black women because of what they’ve seen on TV or heard. It’s like they think they can do or say things to us they can’t with other women. Black guys are usually more laid-back about it. They don’t just go nuts because a naked woman is in the room. They enjoy, but’s not the same thing."
Daisy, age thirty-three, stripped for five years at a variety of clubs in the Los Angeles area and says that mainstream society’s attitudes toward African American women may have played a big factor in the Duke scandal, and those attitudes forced her to quit the business sooner than she’d planned. "I think blakc women are seen as the lowest of the low in society. We don’t county, so why not violate us?" says Daisy, who now works as a paralegal. "I saw that attitude in the clubs when white customers would come in. They would make me feel really dirt, and that’s not how I normally felt up there. I’d be cool when I left the stage, unless a white man was up-front and center looking at me in a way that sent chills up my spine."
Evil white men always looking to rape black women. This made me so mad I looked up the statistics.
It turns out that it verges on the impossible to find a case of a white man raping a black woman.
According to this site (and its statistics are accurate):
When whites do violence — rape, murder, assault — how often do they choose black victims? Shouldn’t a nation of bigots target blacks most of the time? At least half of the time? Of course, it does not. When whites commit violence, they to it to blacks 2.4 percent of the time. Blacks, on the other hand, choose white victims more than half the time. [317]
In those cases in which the race of the killer is known, blacks kill twice as many whites as whites kill blacks. Black-on-white robberies and gang assaults are twenty-one times more common than white on black. In the case of gang robbery, blacks victimize whites fifty-two times more often than whites do blacks. [318]
The contrasts are even more stark in the case of interracial rape. Studies from the late 1950s showed that the vast majority of rapes were same-race offenses. Research in Philadelphia carried out in 1958 and 1960 indicated that of all rapes, only 3.2 percent were black-on-white assaults and 3.6 percent were white-on-black. Since that time, the proportion of black-on-white rapes has soared. In a 1974 study in Denver, 40 percent of all rapes were of whites by blacks, and not one case of white-on-black rape was found. In general, through the 1970s, black-on-white rape was at least ten times more common that white-on-black rape. [319]
Because interracial rape is now overwhelmingly black on white, it has become difficult to do research on it or to find relevant statistics. The FBI keeps very detailed national records on crime, but the way it presents rape data obscures the racial element rather than clarifies it. Dr. William Wilbanks, a criminologist at Florida International University, had to sift carefully through the data to find that in 1988 there were 9,406 cases of black-on-white rape and fewer than ten cases of white-on-black rape. [320] Another researcher concludes that in 1989, blacks were three or four times more likely to commit rape than whites, and that black men raped white women thirty times as often as white men raped black women. [321]
Interracial crime figures are even worse than they sound. Since there are more than six times as many whites as blacks in America, it means that any given black person is vastly more likely to commit a crime against a white than vice versa.
Notes
317. "What Should Be Done," US News & World Report (August 22, 1989), p. 54. See also Department of Justice, Criminal Victimization in the United States, 1987 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1989), p.7.
318. Department of Justice, Criminal Victimization in the United States, 1987.
319. Gary D. LaFree, "Male Power and Female Victimization: Toward a Theory of Interracial Rape," American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 88, No. 2 (September 1982).
320. William Wilbanks, "Frequency and Nature of Interracial Crimes," submitted for publication to the Justice Professional (November 7, 1990). Data derived from Department of Justice, Criminal Victimization in the United States, 1987, p. 53.
321. Andrew Hacker, Two Nations, pp. 183, 185.
Jared Taylor, Paved with Good Intentions: The Failure of Race Relations in Contemporary America (New York: Carrol & Graf, 1992), 92-93.
According to FrontPageMag.com (Lawrence Auster):
Like Ahab’s search for the Great White Whale, liberals’ search for the Great White Defendant is relentless and never-ending. When, in 1988, Tawana Brawley’s and Al Sharpton’s then year-old spectacular charge that several white men including prosecutor Steven Pagones (whose name Brawley had picked out of a newspaper article) had abducted and raped the 15 year old was shown to be completely false, the Nation said it didn’t matter, since the charges expressed the essential nature of white men’s treatment of black women in this country. When the Duke University lacrosse players were accused of raping a black stripper last year, liberals everywhere treated the accusation as fact, because, just as with the Nation and Tawana Brawley, the rape charge seemed to the minds of liberals to reflect the true nature of oppressive racial and sexual relations in America.
To see the real truth of the matter, let us take a look at the Department of Justice document Criminal Victimization in the United States, 2005. (Go to the linked document, and under "Victims and Offenders" download the pdf file for 2005.)
In Table 42, entitled "Personal crimes of violence, 2005, percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender," we learn that there were 111,590 white victims and 36,620 black victims of rape or sexual assault in 2005. (The number of rapes is not distinguished from those of sexual assaults; it is maddening that sexual assault, an ill-defined category that covers various types of criminal acts ranging from penetration to inappropriate touching, is conflated with the more specific crime of rape.) In the 111,590 cases in which the victim of rape or sexual assault was white, 44.5 percent of the offenders were white, and 33.6 percent of the offenders were black. In the 36,620 cases in which the victim of rape or sexual assault was black, 100 percent of the offenders were black, and 0.0 percent of the offenders were white. The table explains that 0.0 percent means that there were under 10 incidents nationally.
The table does not gives statistics for Hispanic victims and offenders. But the bottom line on interracial white/black and black/white rape is clear:
In the United States in 2005, 37,460 white females were sexually assaulted or raped by a black man, while between zero and ten black females were sexually assaulted or raped by a white man.
What this means is that every day in the United States, over one hundred white women are raped or sexually assaulted by a black man.
The Department of Justice statistics refer, of course, to verified reports. According to the Wikipedia article on rape, as many as half of all rape charges nationally are determined by police and prosecutors to be false:
Linda Fairstein, former head of the New York County District Attorney’s Sex Crimes Unit, noted, "There are about 4,000 reports of rape each year in Manhattan. Of these, about half simply did not happen…. It’s my job to bring justice to the man who has been falsely accused by a woman who has a grudge against him, just as it’s my job to prosecute the real thing." No wonder there was such absolute belief in the guilt of the Duke students among the leading sectors of liberal America. A drug-addled, half-deranged, promiscuous black stripper accused three young white men of raping her. There are virtually zero rapes of black women by white men in the United States, and half of all rape charges against specific individuals turn out to be false. But in the gnostic, inverted world of liberal demonology, the white students had to be guilty.
Meanwhile, in the real America, week after week, the newspapers report the rapes of white women by black men—though, of course, without ever once using the words, "a white woman was raped by black man." Just last week in the New York Post there was a story about a serial black rapist who invaded women’s apartments on Manhattan’s Upper West Side; you knew the rapist was black from a police drawing accompanying the story, and you knew the victims were most likely white from the neighborhoods where the attacks occurred. But even when news media’s reports of black on white rape make the race of the perpetrator evident (which the media only does in a minority of instances), no explicit reference is ever made to the racial aspect of the case. Each story of black on white rape is reported in isolation, not presented as part of a larger pattern. There is never the slightest mention of the fact that white women in this country are being targeted by black rapists. In the inverted world of liberalism, the phenomenon does not exist.
I love how Samuels describes one black stripper getting pregnant outside of marriage: "…Diahn learned she was pregnant with her son when she was eighteen and about to start her first year at a junior college in her hometown."
She "learned she was pregnant." Not that she screwed around and made stupid choices, no, this girl passively "learns she was pregnant."
It’s interesting that Luke chose to get his “statistics” from a white supremacist website.
Speaking of racial statistics, why is it that the majority of serial killers always seem to be white males? Just wondering.
because in order to become a SERIAL killer, you have to be smart enough to get caught from the first time. That implies planning, forensics knowledge and generally stuff that your local “brother” can’t even pronounce.
Obviously i meant “not to get caught” above, ate the “not” apparently.
“get his ‚Äústatistics‚Äù from a white supremacist website.” Ummmm yes Luke.
The sources for the statistics from the first website are these:
317. “What Should Be Done,” US News & World Report (August 22, 1989), p. 54. See also Department of Justice, Criminal Victimization in the United States, 1987 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1989), p.7.
318. Department of Justice, Criminal Victimization in the United States, 1987.
319. Gary D. LaFree, “Male Power and Female Victimization: Toward a Theory of Interracial Rape,” American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 88, No. 2 (September 1982).
320. William Wilbanks, “Frequency and Nature of Interracial Crimes,” submitted for publication to the Justice Professional (November 7, 1990). Data derived from Department of Justice, Criminal Victimization in the United States, 1987, p. 53.
321. Andrew Hacker, Two Nations, pp. 183, 185.
Jared Taylor, Paved with Good Intentions: The Failure of Race Relations in Contemporary America (New York: Carrol & Graf, 1992), 92-93.
If you have any evidence that these statistics are incorrect, please post that evidence.
Yes, the website that evidence appears on seems racist, but I am not blogging about that website. I am writing about a narrowly drawn issue — whether or not white men are raping black women in large numbers a la the Duke University lacrosse team members versus the lying stripper. In that regard, I welcome truth from any source, even if it appears on despicable websites.
I have not made any arguments about intrinsic racial nature. Whites, for instance, made the holocaust in Europe, while blacks have also committed numerous genocides in Africa. It does seem that most serial killers in America are white.
I suspect that in the past, there were far more white rapes of blacks. But I am not talking about that issue either.
Hyde emails me:
Every time you post one of these stories and start rattling off statistics about black v. white crime, I’m forced to wonder what on earth your agenda is? What exactly is it about this excerpt from Samuel’s book that made you “so mad”? Is it the suggestion that whites are just as capable of commiting violent crimes as blacks? Or is it that old resentment that guilt-ridden whites harbor once again resurfacing at the mention of blacks as social victims? Why does this make you angry Luke? We all know that blacks [ particularly young black men in the innercity ] are statistically more likely to commit violent crimes… but we also all know that this nothing more than the direct result of poverty and discrimination. That’s nothing more than common sense Luke. Disenfranchised people living in poverty are just more likely to commit crime… regardless of their color. Unless, of course, you’re suggesting that black people are just more violent because they’re black? And if that’s what you’re suggesting, just say it. Embrace your racism and own up to it, instead of skirting around the issue.
And as long as we’re on the specific subject of black men raping white women, let me ask you this.Your diligent research yielded this set of figures:
“Research in Philadelphia carried out in 1958 and 1960 indicated that of all rapes, only 3.2 percent were black-on-white assaults and 3.6 percent were white-on-black. Since that time, the proportion of black-on-white rapes has soared. In a 1974 study in Denver, 40 percent of all rapes were of whites by blacks, and not one case of white-on-black rape was found. In general, through the 1970s, black-on-white rape was at least ten times more common that white-on-black rape.”
Impossible to find a case of a white man raping a black woman, huh? What do you think the statistics of white men raping black women would be if you were to check records prior to 1950?… or let’s say the 250 years prior to 1970? [ particularly in the south ]. My guess is that if you broadened the scope of your research, you’d find that black women have by far suffered considerably more at the hands of white men, than white women have suffered at the hands of black men.
As for recent statistics, I’ve always heard that rape is most likely to occur between people that know each other, and so it would seem likely that most rapes would occur with members of the same race. But assuming your statistics are accurate, and black men are now more likely to rape white women, I would only take this to be further proof that the predominant image of beauty and desirability perpetuated in the American media continues to be the white woman [ an image sold to blacks as well as whites ], and thus black men are just as likely as white men to pursue white women as the object of sexual conquest.
Personally though, I don’t see the point of rehashing all these numbers. It serves no purpose other than to deepen racial division and feelings of mistrust and resentment. No individual or group in this country is free of sin, and ultimately we all have to atone for the crimes of our nation, past and present. So I’m officially calling you out Luke. What point are you trying to make? Are you implying that blacks are inherently more violent because they’re black? [ the racist explanation ], or are blacks and other minorities simply statistically more like to commit crime because they’re statistically more likely to suffer from the effects of discrimination? Take a position and stand behind it. Are you a racist or not Luke? And if you are, at least have the balls to state it unequivocally. I may not agree with you, but at least I could respect you.
Moxie emails:
I just saw William Hyde’s explanation that the root cause of African American Violence is poverty. However, like a good little liberal, he refuses to point out the root cause of the poverty comes uniquely from the black community.
-Over 70% of black children are fatherless.
-Black children are taught through their peers that a man getting an education and standing by his family is “acting white”.
-Meanwhile, becomming a rapper, ball player or thug and fathering numerous children by multiple women (subsequently abandoning them to welfare) is “keeping it real.”
All of the root causes of African American poverty come from within that community. Until people start realizing that Bill Cosby was right, African American’s will stay hopelessly mired in poverty and on welfare. Its time for African American’s to look in the mirror, take account for their own failings and move on. But the crutch of blaming the devil white man is just too easy, like political crack.
Sounds like the women in the book have self esteam issues and use their race as a excuse. How about the blacks recently in Long Beach Ca. that beat up the white girls? What excuse or lie can someone come up with to justify
that? I love these facts and want to put this in the face of the truth denying idiot liers out there.
“-Over 70% of black children are fatherless.
-Black children are taught through their peers that a man getting an education and standing by his family is “acting white”.
-Meanwhile, becomming a rapper, ball player or thug and fathering numerous children by multiple women (subsequently abandoning them to welfare) is “keeping it real.”
All of the root causes of African American poverty come from within that community. Until people start realizing that Bill Cosby was right, African American‚Äôs will stay hopelessly mired in poverty and on welfare. Its time for African American‚Äôs to look in the mirror, take account for their own failings and move on. But the crutch of blaming the devil white man is just too easy, like political crack.”
Deal with facts not conjecture or emotions when casting your lying, hateful, racist, disparageing remarks about whites.
Moxie, please restore my faith in XPT’s mods, and tell me you’re smarter than this…?! Children born out of wedlock is a byproduct of poverty, not the “root cause”. Look at any impoverished community, and you’ll see the exact same syndrome, regardless of its racial profile: Illegitimacy, substance abuse, crime, inadequate healthcare, lower life expectancy, and lack of education. These problems plague every community living below the poverty line, from the innercity to the midwest to Appalachia. The root cause of the problems in the African American community are a DIRECT RESULT of their history… namely, 300 years of being bought and sold as property, and another 100 years of defacto slavery under Jim Crow [ which I’ll remind you was only formally laid to rest a generation ago! ]. Education was off limits to blacks, and it was even prohibited to teach blacks to read. Marriage was forbidden, and couples and families were routinely separated… all in a calculated attempt to prevent blacks from forming any sort of culture or stable community [ which they still succeeded in doing in spite of all this ].
And your claims that …
“Black children are taught through their peers that a man getting an education and standing by his family is acting white” or that “becomming a rapper, ball player or thug and fathering numerous children by multiple women is ‘keeping it real’ ”
…are not only patently false, but demonstrate what a ridiculously twisted view you have of blacks in America. Although I would agree that African Americans have nothing to gain from obsessing over the issue of blame, that still doesn’t change the fact that we all know where the blame lies. Sit through the most liberal, progressive course in American history, and you’ll still encounter a pantheon of white male faces. There’s a white man on every bill and coin in my pocket, and in every presidential portrait. White men can rightfully take credit for almost every major scientific and social achievement in the western world. But along with all that credit, white men also deserve the blame for most of our nation’s sins… including slavery, colonialism, genocide, and war. You don’t like it? Too fuckin’ bad my friend… that’s YOUR heritage. Deal with it.
Hyde you are in such deniel. You obviously have a chip on your shoulder and don’t like facts. Have you ever lived in an are like Labrea and Washington Ave. here in LA. CA.? I have. Your jealous and racist. Which is so transparent in your statemants. Blacks are the original slave traders, who sold there own to others. Which does not justifie slavery of anyone, any where past or present. That is YOUR hetitage if you are black. Deal with that FACT. Pac-Man is a “black athelete” Mike Tyson, OJ Simpson, Dayrel Strawberry, Michael Spinks.
I could go on. It would be too easy. The point is that blacks are no more exempt than whites at being corrupt peices of shit. People regardless of skin color are just people. in my opinion it is environment, education and disapline that seperate the Scumbags from the earnest ones in our world. What was done in the past right or wrong can never be changed, unless you have a magical time machine. We can learn from it. But to want something of a monitary payback or apology now from people that were not even alive 300 years ago is psycotic and serves no real purpose for progress. Larry Elder has a radio talk show and is a prominant lawyer, the late great Mr. Johnny Cochren another brillent person, Harold Ford in Tenn., Barrac Obama, These are just a few examples of many, many blacks that did’nt waste their time and lives being pissed off little bitch’s making excuses for lazy criminals and enablers that have high jacked black America. Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton are black Americas real enemy. They benefit from racisam. Think about it what would they do or be with out it.