Monday, August 14th, 2000
Linda Lovelace - E! True Hollywood Story
The E! Channel is making a True Hollywood Story documentary on Linda Lovelace. The producer Dan Isaacson, who produced the excellent two hour special on Savannah, flew to Denver this afternoon. He has dinner with Linda tonight and interviews her on camera tomorrow. Bill Margold and Gloria Leonard have also been interviewed.
WEHT To Lori Lovett?
David writes: Hi there Luke, I was wondering if you could tell me what ever happened to Lori Lovett? believe it or not I actually went to high school with her and both my brother and I dated her before she got into the porn business. I have heard that she is either passed away, or in jail.
Ginger Lynn's Non-Porn Film Premiere
Swifty Lazar writes on RAME: Viewed the premiere of "The last late night" in providence this weekend and the rhode island international film festival. The movie sucked.Actors made TT Boy look like Olivier, in all seriousness Ginger had the most presence. i don't think it's because she's Ginger (though I am sure that helps)...she really was the best.
she was a trashy trophy wife (an ex stripper) for a fat middle aged business man who had a penchant for booze and drugs. the story revolved around a young couple who were beginning new careers and putting their younger wilder ways behind them..they moved into suburbs, had matching jobs and work clothes....a wild friend of the hubby's shows up unexpectedly,he was an old college party friend who hadn't "grown up" .... the new suburbanizedd couple wants the friend to stay calm and get cleaned up for their party they are having fr their coworkers. the guy agrees but is a trouble maker at heart and you know he will pull some s---. the guests include the young couples boss w his wife (ginger).
everyone is uptight at first until the party friend starts acting up and whips out some drugs.....lo and behold the uptight fathead boss is a coke head and boozer...anywyays,,,the boss gets drunk and goes out on a beer run..GINGER stays back at the house and f---s the frat party friend..we see some breasts,,and ginger attacks the guy......she also does some teasing talk about how her hubby doesnt f--- her and this guy (the couples house guest) should put up or shut up...so they go upstairs and f---. a truly horrible movie...but fun only becuase ginger was in it, the acting belonged in a caballero production. it actually looked and read like a bad porn except there was more story and only a view of ginger's tits. at least ginger is getting work!
Wonderful Pornography - Narrated By William Shatner
Chaim: I am watching the most wonderful pornographic video as I type this - "Trinity and Beyond: The Atomic Bomb Movie", narrated by the famous jew William Shatner. Lots of archival footage of American, Russian, and Chinese atmospheric Atomic and Hydrogen bomb tests. Lots of jews figure in this video too, from Oppenheimer to Klaus Fuchs to the great Edward Teller (my Landsman).
Seriously, I could watch this video over and over and over and over again and never tire of it.
You know Luke, I am not suggesting any causality here, but back when America conducted nuclear testing out in the open the way God intended, the Wogs knew their place and there was no damn West Nile virus in New York.
You should get this video and watch it before every date you go out on. The sight of all these thermonuclear warheads going off will put you in a confident frame of mind.
I don't know which is the prettiest - Castle Bravo, Ivy Mike, Nugget, Storax, or Dominic. And then there is the choice of test site: Christmas Island, Bikini, or Frenchman Flat in Nevada? Oh man, this is such a hot video! Seriously, if this sort of porn were more widely available, men would watch fewer videos of women in unhygienic circumstances.
The big Australian porn webmasters are known as masters of spamming, sending out millions of unsolicited and unwanted emails advertising porn websites, including bestiality sites.
Perhaps the biggest spammer is John Atherton, who's lives in Brisbane along with his peers Dean Shannon, Greg Lasrado and Scott Phillips.
Sean writes: "Jon Atherton is the next largest with Scott Phillips, Jon is building a 8 Million dollar house in the same street that Greg Lazrado lives in. Jon is one of the largest spammers in the marketplace he runs a small office down in milton, but also uses servers out of Shannon's operation."
Luke: I believe that Shannon and Atherton are both hosted by Global Centre. But Shannon does not host Atherton. Jon and Dean are friends but they both claim they have no financial connection beyond sending each other traffic.
Jon Atherton sent out over three million spam emails this weekend advertising Farmsex.com in this manner: "DIRTY FARM BITCHES Ed's got the biggest cock on the farm & the girls just love to help him show it off ! This guy really is impressive & shoots a gallon when handled right. Join the girls giving Ed a regular handling..."
Raw Alex: "Chris, funniest part is that the page in that spam has been taken down and replaced with a cyberotica link on a fake 404 page. FM [Ron Levi], you guys seem to be buying spam traffic from a beasty site..."
Creed: Millions of people around the world received multiple spams over the weekend from a program called click-for-sex run by Jon Twilite. His twilite is coming as we speak. Please send a copy of the spam to abuse@ibill.com. DO NOT mail the RBL. We have the power and opportunity to police ourselves by ostracizing those who imperil our business. Shame on Cybererotica if they take that traffic. Conservatively that spam went out to 3 million homes probably many more.
Ron Levi responds: RawAlex, The account started sending us traffic 10am this morning - we cancelled the account at 10:30am It's sending traffic to our New Free Program so we are hard coding a redirect that will send all traffic to a "THIS ACCOUNT HAS BEEN CANCELLED FOR SPAMMING" page which will be up any minute.
The registered name is Spotwire jon@spotwire.com Company: Spotwire Address: PO Box 1240 MILTON QLD 4064 Phone:01161419779239 Country: Australia
Luke: I called the number and asked for Jon Atherton. A man answered the phone, then hung up on me.
XXX: There are only a few guarantees in life and one guarantee is Fantasyman does not tolerate spam and does not pay spammers...
FM aka Ron Levi: This spammer is really upset that his name, address and telephone number were publicly posted. He thinks I have the ability to pull the post I made with his personal info on Netpond - that's comical! lol
Jon Atherton responds on Netpond: Gee Ron, You sure know how to change your spots quickly..... It was only a few months ago that you were begging for spam - how quickly things change. In fact I seem to remember.... how many signups did you get Ron??? We deleted all the spam accounts this morning they do in fact go thru to a 404 page, and for a short time yes they were directed to CE [Off the 404 page]- how does this sound Ron - you donate the income from the 29 signups that were generated in the hour or so that the link was up - to a decent charity and I won't think of you as a complete hypocryte.
I dare say you don't mind what I think, but there may be a few people here who might wonder.... I am not going to sit here and lie, the spam was sent by an affiliate, it generated so much traffic that I found it pretty bloody difficult to delete the accounts - 1400 signups over the weekend alone. I bet anyone here would leave THAT turned on for a while! We will not be accepting his traffic now, mainly due to the heat it caused on this board. I MUST POINT OUT, that the heat was limited to this board only - there were a total of 12 complaints sent to our service provider, and about 8 to me.... it is a very good list, just seems to have a few webmasters on it..... It's about time you people stopped carrying on like little kids pointing fingers at all the other kids in the playground, and got on with some work, I would like to bet that NONE of you know how to generate that sort of traffic that quickly.
FM : Jon I never begged for anything in my life, it's obvious you don't know me as others do :-) I'll donate the money to my employees that had to take their time out today to hardcode a rediect of your account, screen save and post your info now you come here and post that it only created heat on this board - justifying spam - you're a sick individual.
Jon: Not sick Ron; bloody right and you know it. It would seem you are a hypocryte, and I really don't *want* to know you I guess. The only time I ever met you was in Vegas last year, and you struck me as a rude bastard who was really up himself, but that WAS only my impression.... and it was before lunch... I was not justifying spam - simply pointing out that it bloody works and works well. The heat WAS confined to this board - and Brad - we didn't send it - look at the headers!
Creed: Jon Atherton YOU f---ING LYING SICK STUPID ASS MUTHERFUKER! I CAUGHT YER SPAMMING SCAMMING ASS AND YOU ARE NOT GOING TO GET AWAY WITH ANYTHING YOU DICK! I SAVED THE HTML SOURCE CODE AND SCREEN CAPTURED EVERY DAMN WEBPAGE DOCUMENTING AND PROVING IRREFUTABLY YOU, SACK O s--- SPAMMER, SENT THE SPAMS ADVERTISING YOUR SICKO BEASTIALITY CRAP SITES YOURSELF! THAT URL IN THE SPAM HAS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH YOUR PATHETIC WEBMASTER PROGRAM. THOSE SPAM URLS GO TO A SEPERATE IBILL JOIN PAGE COMPLETE WITH A NON EXISTENT CUSTOMER SUPPORT EMAIL ADDRESS, m-dunkley@hotmail.com. LIAR, MAGGOT, SICK SPAMMING PRICK!!!
Jon: Chris, Headers might not mean squat, but I am stuffed if I know how you can send thru so many different servers.... if you want to find out ask the guy that did it: clickmail1@yahoo.com Anyway - I think a few people missed the point - I am not complaining about Ron dropping the account - I couldn't care too much about it really, it was only 5000 hits and 29 signups in an hour or so.... I sent it from a 404 page after deleting a url that had been spammed to, so I wasn't spamming the CE link, I guess he should have been asked given the circumstances. I am also not trying to justify spam, but when someone says they have an opt-in list and they can send you 1000 signups in a few days - NORMALLY you'd listen. If I see one more full header of an email....! geeez I might just post all the spams I have got advertising just about every site in that list of links at the top of this board!
Jeff Miller: Jon/Twilite... Rarely do I find the need to swear in any of my posts to get my point across, but seriously dude, shut the f--- up already. You are full of s--- and everyone knows it. It wasnt an opt in list that happened to have a few webmaster email addressess on it. I for one got about 127 of the stupid things, addressed to email addresses that exist ONLY on webpages deep within my site(s). You harvested e-mail addresses from the web, or bought a list from someone who does and you spammed. Admit it and move on. Or dont admit it, it doesnt really matter. But, the more you deny it, and the more you lie about it, the more you look like an even bigger dumbf---.
FM: Jon you're admitting that you pointed the traffic to us at the end of the weekend so we would grab the heat of the entire spamming - gee thanx :-) then... You are berating me in public while sending me emails asking if we can be friends? You should be nominated for a Darwinism Award. Do they have one 'down under'?
Creed: I know you sent the spam yourself. Even in the best light you knew and did everything possible to facilitate your anonymous spammer which is the SAME f---ing thing. Only Ibill would let a webmaster get away with that bulls---e. Jon take your lame excuses and go away. No webmaster in his right mind wants to do business with a quick buck artist spammer with poor judgement like you. Old Net proverb "Guy who takes shortcuts getting traffic takes shortcuts paying for it".
Jon: Quite frankly - I couldn't give a rats arse what you *think* you fund out about the email that was sent. The facts are:
1. It was sent to just over 7 million people.
2. It was sent to an old opt-in list that was run with remove links for years.
3. Some webmasters got the email - but to be honest you probably saw it more on this freaking board than in your inbox
4. It created about 1400 signups in 2 1/2 days @$25 per signup that is not too bad [I prepaid for 1000 after a test run]
5. If you want to keep posting about it 3 days after the mail was sent fine, but stop posting the whole f---ing thing.
6. hahahahahaha go f--- yourself creed - you are a screaming *anon* mental case.
7. Ron, I thought what I said was reasonably sarcastic, if you didn't catch that -it must be too early for you...
This is my last post on the matter - and Creed - I can bet that I'll be around longer than you, and have been around longer than you.... you only just popped up in the last few days anyway as far as I can make out - go crawl back into your hole...
Raw Alex writes on Netpond: I think we can all agree: There is no way to tell (without asking) if a mailbox belongs to a child or an adult. We need to "opt in" people to confirm their addresses, and their willingness to receive adult materials. We have to avoid sending stuff to children. We have to avoid sending stuff to people who don't want porn. Blinding sending messages to culled or made up addresses is the most dangerous thing that our business can do. The chance that at least 1 of your mails is misdirected is just about 100%. I am all for opt-in lists. Heck, I have one.
I think opt-in is great, I never bitch about confirmed opt-in spam that I get - I asked for it. But I do object to people scanning a chatroom and culling addresses, assuming I want their commercial missives. In canada, if I put a "NO ADMAIL" on my mailbox, the post office is required to NOT deliver anything that is not personally addressed. Further more, door to door flyer delivery people are suppose to (they don't always)skip my door. The phonecalls must be done within set hours. There is a huge difference between an opt in list and spam - opt in is great, spam is just bad for our business.
Vivid Video Goes To Bat For The Democrats
David Schlesinger, head of Vivid Video's huge internet operation (about $40 million a year) writes on Netpond: As we are all well aware, the adult industry can be severely affected this November if we elect an unfriendly administration. It is extremely important that we, as a unified industry deliver the message to our customers, users, friends and family that they must vote in this very crucial election and choose elected officials who will continue to protect our freedoms.
We have created unique voter awareness web pages ( http://www.vote2k.net ), mails, and special messages to champion our cause. And we are asking our friends and colleagues to please include these pages in your exit consoles and mail programs, link to them through all of your affiliate programs, and give them as much exposure as possible. Click on http://www.vote2k.net and check it out. We will all benefit from this unified effort that can assure us of continued prosperity.
Going forward we will be providing you with material on a weekly basis that you can simply plug into your operations. We can't impress upon you enough how crucial this is to our futures. We know you will support our efforts and yourselves by getting the message to vote out to everyone who values their Constitutional right to choose what they see and purchase.
Diamond Jim replies on Netpond: While considering which elected officials might be best, reflect on the fact that the Democrats just forced one of their shining lights AWAY from having a fundraiser at the Playboy mansion. Playboy...one of the few bastions of "respectable" porn in the world. What do you think these same Democrats might do to us? Things may not be what they seem....
Molly Wood Retires
I found this on RAME: After her scene in Real Sex Magazine 21, Molly Wood has retired from porn and returned to San Diego.
Ben Dover on Max Hardcore
Ben Dover writes: Hi Luke, Ben Dover here, I have just read your section on Max Hardcore, and I noticed a quote about him that was attributed to me. The only thing that bothers me somewhat is that the quote was quite complimentry and I wouldn't like people who read it to get the wrong idea! I would like you and anybody else who could care less what I think to know that I think Max is a misogynist git, and I think his attitude and his films suck. I'm all for a bit of role playing now and again, but he really has [ I think ] taken the whole thing waaaay too far. I have no idea on the chaps state of mind, but I would have to say I think he could be charitably described as mentally 'unstable'. Now [ obviously ] I'm no censorist but I think a bit of common sense should perhaps prevail. However, having said all that, maybe we should be thankful that he gets this revolting attitude to women out of his system via his movies, because it frightens the life out of me wondering what he would be up to in everyday life if there wasn't this release for him to utilize. After all, let's face it; would Max ever get laid if he wasn't in this business? [Before you say it, okay, nor would I !!!!! ] Let's kind of be grateful for the girls who do work for him, at least they get paid for the abuse. Please rectify the piece asap. Thanks Luke, all the best matey. Ben Dover.
Phyllisha Anne Flakes?
JTVideo (the man who shot Luke's porno) writes: phylicia anne is added to the flake/stupid drunken whore list... phylicia anne failed to show up twice for a "MAKE YOUR OWN VIDEO" http://surf.to/jtvideo
first her excuse was that she just decided to have breast implants and didnt realize she wouldnt be able to work the next day! DUH? we rescheduled for 2 weeks later(yesterday)and i called to confirm. no one knew where she was at her home. she never answers her celphone and says she never checks the voicemail! thats a great idea! she returned a page 1hr. before the shoot was scheduled and sounded drunk. said she could not show up due to personal problems. sounds more like drinking problems to me! BTW: IM CELEBRATING MY 12TH ANNIVERSARY THIS MONTH! Neither REB (PGI) OR FLAKEY MODELS WILL STOP ME!
More trouble in Sweden porn king Milton's paradise
STOCKHOLM, Aug 14 (Reuters) - Berth Milton, the head of an adult entertainment empire who was forced to sell his luxury home to pay Swedish taxes, is now being sued by his estranged father for not giving back the family Rolls Royce.
Stockholm city court confirmed on Monday that Berth Milton senior had filed the suit against his son Berth Milton junior, who is chairman and chief executive of U.S.-listed Private Media Group and described in Swedish media as the ``king of porn.''
Darkstar Video
Sean writes: Dear Lukey, what's up with this? http://members.aol.com/dark%20starvideo/ for $500 they'll put you in an adult video to build up your reel so you can break into porn. You think its a good idea for a guy that is trying to be the next Ron Jeremy?
Anna Malle Update
KMAC writes: Luke, I was at the bar Hogs & Heifers this Saturday in NYC and Anna Malle got up on the bar and put on a great 10 minute show for the bar crowd. (Drunk bar patrons get up and take off their bra). She looked great and the whole bar ended up chanting her name and she essentially got completely nude. She was also on stage with another cutie who looked familiar but I don't know her name - they were together. She was doing Vodka shots.
Circus MaxXximus - Entertainment Minimus
Your Pal Tal writes on RAME: >Circus MaxXximus, the PAW charity event, yesterday (Aug 12) was great. >We all had lots of fun. The car wash drew huge crows and people lined >up to get their vehicles washed by near naked porn girls.
XTC Management replies on RAME: OK Tal. As much as I appreciate what PAW does for the industry, I can't condone you straight-out lying to the true adult video fans out there who may be reading this. This year's Circus MaxXximus was a JOKE!!
Fun? If you consider a small group of fans (and an even smaller group of talent) moping around complaining about the heat and the lack of things to do as being "fun"? .. Well, I guess we're all entitled to our own opinions as to what Fun means.
Huge crowds? I was there for over an hour and a half, and at no time did any one booth have more than one or two people in front of it if they had anyone in front of it at all! I'd say that during the entire time I was there (from around noon to 1:30) there might have been 100 people maximum as attendees of the event.
Near naked porn girls? First of all, none of the 'real' porn stars were actually washing the few vehicles coming through the line. For those of you who may later see photos to the contrary, the "stars" such as XXX and Shayla LaVeaux simply came by the Car Wash area when a photo opportunity presented itself. And as for the "near naked" part, well most of the unknown girls roaming the event were better-off keeping their clothes on!
Wanting to help-out the cause I brought my vehicle to the event to get it washed, paid my $25.00 contribution, and then pulled-in only to find that 'Big & Bigger' (two of the nastiest, fattest, underdressed women?) we're doing the actual washing! And I won't even bother to mention just how unorganized the entrance & parking situations were.
Please understand that I'm not trying to put down your efforts to make this a potentially big event (perhaps some time in the future); however, your claims of the success of this year's Circus MaxXximus are nothing more than LIES!! The true adult video fan deserves more than that! Better luck next year!
Rob writes on RAME: Kudos to you on your charity work, but a blood drive was a poor public relations choice. Sex workers by the very nature of their jobs are in a high risk population. To visibly link porners with the Red Cross would undermine the public's perception of blood supply safety. Want to help the Red Cross? Write a check. How about a coat drive or canned food drive next time?
Patrick Riley writes on RAME: Despite General Schvantzkoph's very good analysis of the risk factors, Torris's sarcasm, and even Jones' comments about virii, you just don't get it, do you Tal?
Your Pal Tal wrote: >Not that it matters but in college I did off campus study with a >chiropractor for a year, took classes in various forms of massage, >including shiatsu (acupressure), and took a sports medicine class. And, >while taking an extra semester studying in Scotland, I trained in >Applied Kineseology (Touch for Health).
PR: You doubtless left out the instruction on the use of magnets, crystal rubbing, and the use of apricot pits to cure leukemia and you're right it doesn't matter. It might matter if you have a Ph.D in infectious diseases or work in that area for the NIH or the Red Cross in which case you could argue with the blood donation people about the way they test the blood and who they accept as donors. But then you probably wouldn't because you'd agree with them.
> And as part of the PAW >Foundation's HelpLine (We've set up an 800 number that porn stars can >call 24/7 anytime they need to talk about various problems.) I've had >training from a clinical pssychologist/marriage and family therapist. And this qualifies you how? >What I was saying about the process of preparing blood after it has been >collected in a blood drive is that the process is quite thorough. They >just don't take the pint of blood drawn from someone and stick it in a >freezer until it's needed.
PR: Whole blood is a living thing; it's not frozen. To do so would kill it. Think about it for a moment. If you could freeze blood there would be no need for the urgent calls for various types of blood that the Red Cross puts out from time to time. They'd have a big stockpile. Like oil we'd have a Strategic Blood Reserve.
> The blood goes through a lot in the >preparation process. And I found the process amazing. >But you are correct that the process is not 100 percent in filtering out >all possible impurities. There's always going to be a risk for the >recipient of any blood. And since porn stars are tested for HIV on a >regular basis, might not their blood be acceptable for donation when >they show the test that indicates they have a negative HIV status?
PR: Window, Tal. The window is the period of time between which you contract HIV and it shows up on the HIV test. Other diseases have windows too. This is why they exclude certain groups from being blood donors based on belonging to that group because the group is more likely than others to get the disease and for it to be undetected by the testing.
Think: Porn performer is tested on 8/1/00. Negative. Gets HIV on 8/5/00. Gives blood on 8/6/00 Blood will likely test negative on 8/7/00 and be transfused into some poor unsuspecting car accident victim who some weeks or months later will show up as HIV+. Waaa! And, of course, we well know that the blood testing by the blood lady is 100% accurate, right? And we can trust the porn industry, right?
Nor BTW do they filter out the impurities (some people have bizarre ideas). What they do is run the blood through a series of tests and if it fails any, the blood is discarded. (There is a filtering process but that's when you give platelets and they return the red cells to your body and there's also some form of combination and heating for clotting factor but this has nothing to do with "filtering out impurities".)
Given that there are enough persons in the population willing to give blood who do not run risks of STD's (including but not limited to HIV) because they don't engage in any risky behavior why should the Red Cross and your hypothetical transfusion recipient incur any risk in this area?
Just two questions should be enough to disqualify any porn star: Have you ever had an STD? Have you ever had sex with anyone who has had an STD? (Taken from memory from the NY Red Cross blood donation questionnaire and there are many more along the same lines.) Give up this silliness!
Taliesin: I guess I don't get it. Because all I want to do is help. But I see no point in continuing to argue about it here in rame. We've talked this thing to death already. I'm still in negotiations with the Red Cross, and I think having porn stars, not giving blood, but being the attraction or at least part of the the attraction to draw people into giving blood at some future PAW or Free Speech Coalition event is a good idea. If there are any new developments, I'll let you know.
Brandy Alexandre: Still in the Margold club, eh? You can't play both sides of the board. You can't run around yelling "playpen of the damned!" and expect people to embrace it later when you want to be a do-gooder. To get respect you have to look, act, and conduct yourself respectably. The two are polar opposites and it's a STUPID idea. There, I said it.
Jones: Suppose you were tested on Monday? Then Tuesday night you had unprotected sex during a shoot with an actress who was tested the previous week. In the interim her boyfriend got the HIV virus from some casual sex outside their relationship and gave it to her. What good was your test if you got HIV from her and gave blood later that week? I could continue with more examples but I'm sure you get the picture. Tests are fine, but they don't always protect the innocent. You're in a high-risk industry. No way around it.
Lighten up, my friend. Sure it was hot; it was the middle of August in the San Fernando valley. But I heard far fewer complaints than I did compliments about the event. Maybe it wasn't what you expected; it certainly wasn't as big as CES or Night of the Stars or some other events, but it came off pretty well. We weren't trying to compete with the big events. This was smaller and more personal. I'll bet fans got more personal attention from the porn girls, got to spend more time with them and interact with them than at the big events like CES where the fans have to spend hours in line just to get in and wait in more lines to get up-close for a minute or two with their favorite stars. The Circus MaxXximus was a success. And it was a lot of fun.
Jenna Jameson Shoots Layout With Tera Patrick For Hot Video Magazine
Jenna Jameson writes: "Luke, recently, I shot a layout with Tera Patrick for Hot Video magazine. It was the first time I met her, and naturally thought she was bi, because she had agreed to do a photoshoot that was hardcore. Now I'm hearing that she doesn't like girls. WOW! She sure seemed to be into chicks that day! We had an awesome time, playing with that big black strap-on. So, maybe, in all actuality, she's just picky about who she "plays" with! -JJ"
Porner: I talked with tera the other day where she said she was strictly dickly and in no way shape or form likes girls.she said she is the only girl in the biz who does NOT do girls...and emphasized this very strongly.
Sparky: Luke, You may be interested to know that the recent shoot with Jenna & Tera was actually published in Hot Video 116, which must have been published around March of this year as I have had scans of the layout since that time!!
Alexandra Nice
Porn star Alexandra Nice replies: Brian Kushner: I am pretty sure, that you don't know me at all. Unproffesional is what they did and not me. I can assure you, that I am one of the most proffesional people in the adult industry.
If you don't know, in this business, proffesional = difficult! Patrick and Dion thought, that I am just another girl (one of their) who will do everything to keep a job and they were wrong. I am not just another girl!
I went Vegas only for my fans, who are e-mailing me every single day. I would never go there to sign for 4 days to get only $1,600.
By the way, I took my boyfriend with me at that time and they did agree to pay his expences as well, that's why my rates were that low. Dion's message just pissed me off that much, that I felt, that I should tell people what happend seven months ago. He didn't even say "I'm sorry", like nothing happend.
On the other hand I don't blame him, because it wasn't his fault. Everyone knows who's "The Boss". Brian, I don't want to be rude, that's why I will not tell you to keep the money and buy yourself some ice cream or something. I just want to thank you for your offer, but no, thank you. Believe me, it is not just about money. Hey, it's only 700 hundred bucks. IT'S ABOUT RESPECT TO OTHER PEOPLE!!! All the Best, Alexandra Nice
Cheyenne Silver
Sean writes about Vivid girl Cheyenne Silver: Having read FT's comments regarding "Cheyenne" I found it indescribably sad that this person passes comments that suggest that she epitomises (for this person) one of societies bottom feeders; because she . . "takes it up the ass for a living"!!
Some of the very nicest people I have ever met have been either porn stars or live performers (or both!). In my opinion they bravely perform what is clearly a very demanding job & deserve both recompense & reward for their efforts. Personally I have the very greatest respect for both the individuals and their profession.
Indeed I know only too well how hard adult work can be & not just while the camera's are rolling either! Indeed I respect & trust individuals in the adult film world, both Male & Female far more than I would ever trust any Politician or so-called "pillar of society"!
These individuals perform a role which is both extremely "honest", very beautiful & which places the individual (who is every bit as vulnerable & imperfect as is any other human being) under the spotlight; whereby they will draw these kinds of remarks. It's a cryig shame that the likes of "FT" have nothing better or more valid to do with their own time than to heap unwarranted criticism on beautiful individuals such as Cheyenne when they ought to be lauding her; irrespective of wether the vagaries of sexual preference make them, personally, a fan!
If Cheyenne could validly be criticised for any personal hygiene issue it is hardly FT's role to point this out; indeed were he working closely within the profession & as such had grounds to "know" then this person would also understand that the hardships and close-knit comunal nature of this environment make it doubly detrimental & unnecessary to proffer such sentiments. We are - all of us - without exception, imperfect!
On the point of "Cheyennes" tit job, then I had thought it was an axiom of adult entertainment throughout the civiliworld that performers only undertake those roles & actions that they wish to. Pressure should never be an issue - I only hope that I have been misinformed and that Cheyenne was in reality a willing recipient of her surgery.
I would very much like to take this opportunity to apologise to Cheyenne that she has been so horribly offended by such remarks; if it's any consolation I expect that "FT" & this persons ilk would be scared witless at the very idea of performing such tasks as she does (superbly) & as such is merely showing jealous pique!
Netsurprise vs Netpond
I got this scoop from a source close to Cybererotica, which sponsors Adultnetsurprise.com, a competitor to Netpond as an adult webmaster resource center.
XXX: Supposedly Nick owned one-third of Netpond, and Kaiser owned one-third and Meatman owned one-third. But Nick held everything in his name. Ron Levi, owner of Cybererotica, wanted to do a deal with Nick. But Levi would not put any money up without Kaiser and Meat's ownership being acknowledged. So Levi tried to have Nick formalize his relationships with Kaiser and Nick. When Nick wouldn't do that, Levi made a deal offering no money so Nick couldn't screw them out of the money. And Levi would've owned 49% and they would've owned 51%. And Nick wouldn't do that deal either.
"It came out that Meatman had not been paid for six months and neither had never been given his ownership. So from our perspective, Nick took Netpond from these two guys.
A Grassroots Guide to Lobbying
GeneRoss.com reports: Mike Ross reports that the video titled "A Grassroots Guide to Lobbying" is now finished and will be ready for distribution by August 27. The video runs 43 minutes and was produced in conjunction with VCA Pictures for owners, employees, entertainers and consumers. It was directed by Jane Hamilton and stars Juli Ashton, Nina Hartley, Mike Horner, Dave Cummings, Kylie Ireland, Sindee Cox, Crystal Knight, Stacy Valentine and XXX among others.
According to Ross, the video includes a wealth of political information ranging from how to write a letter to making appointments with elected officials, and how to lobby them. Ross said the video is also being supported by a website, www.firstamendmentlobby.com which contains everything from addresses of groups fighting to protect First Amendment rights to sample letters and direct links to Email addresses of political officials.
Luke: I just watched the tape and made an audio tape recording here.
Concerned writes: I've been burned by AVN's reviews too many times so before I plunk down my hard earned cash for this "Grassroots Guide To Lobbying" I want to get a few things straight:
1) 43 minutes seems awful skimpy. Exactly how many sex scenes does it contain? (B/G and G/G)
2) Is this a "condom only" feature or do the lobbyists go "bareback"?
3) Nina Hartley and Dave Cummings? Is this a gerantaphilia fetish video?
4) Has Pat Riley assessed all the female stars for passable faces, c-section scars and flat asses?
5) Does this video contain any "recycled" vignettes from the '99, '98 or '97 lobbying videos?
No Cunnilingus! No Peace!
Black women rejoice! Click here: Let's Go Snorkeling
On 8/13/100 19:03 Fine Black Pussy wrote: > Please Mr. Marcus, teach the brothas how to eat pussy! Maybe you could make a "How To Eat Pussy Video"? Course the lame ass non-coochie eaters would never rent it, but maybe some would. Do us sistas a service, Mr. Marcus, teach them
On 8/13/100 20:45 MAC wrote: > i feel you Fine Black Pussy......i love eating pussy just as long as it dont stank..aint nothin like suckin on that pearl tongue
Fine writes: I knew there had to be at least one brotha out there who still respects the pussy. You are an endangered species. Your girlfriends are very lucky!
Jenna, you're bisexual. Will you please teach the brothas out there how to eat pussy? We sistas need your help!
On 8/12/100 19:45 Jalen Parker wrote: > Hi gus i'm a new porn director looking for girls and guy to do movies.Anybody out there want to make movies?I would prefer fans of porn,because that what my first movie is going to be about
On 8/13/100 21:05 Fine Black Pussy wrote: > Please do a movie about teaching black men to eat pussy! It is desperately needed!
On 8/13/100 21:42 jalen parker wrote: > I will.Do you want to donate your pussy for the cause?
I only regret that I have but one pussy to give to the cause! You are damn staraight I'll do it! Get the Hickory BBQ sauce ready. I'm a cummin'
Jenna Jameson writes on MrMarcus.com: "I think Marcus is very attractive.... I would never say never..."
Jenna's Dad: Jenna, you've been a very bad girl. Go to MY room!
Mark Kernes In Lynne's Bedroom With Luke
Luke: At last Mark Kernes from AVN and I have found something to unite on - Lynne's bedroom.
Lynne L-patin: I had a dream this morning, just before I woke up. Mark Kernes was in my bedroom dressed in a blue Hawaiian print shirt, with a camera, looking out the window at the garden below.....waiting for you to come over...waiting to pounce on you with pictures
Lynne L-patin: I said, "are you sure you wouldn't like pictures of Luke and I making love instead?" Apparently there were such things! At least a dozen....that I had taken myself with my new disposable camera from Albertson's....
Lynne L-patin: I told him...you will have to print all twelve at once, because if you just print three, he will sue you before you can print the rest....
Religion in Politics
Wayne Gordon writes: And now after the comments made by Lee Alcorn (since deposed as head of the Dallas NAACP) questioning the political loyalties of Lieberman between America and Israel, comes those of Louis Farrakhan, head of the Nation of Islam.
From Saturday's L.A. Times.... "Mr. Lieberman, as an Orthodox Jew, is also a dual citizen of Israel," he told reporters gathered to hear him promote his next Million Man March. "The state of Israel is not synonymous with the United States, and the test he would probably have to pass is: Would he be more faithful to the Constitution of the United Statesthan to the ties that any Jewish person would have to the state of Israel?"
Charles Rangel, congressman from Harlem said to CNN... "Louis Farrakhan and anyone like him should not be welcome in the Democratic or Republican Party."
Good for Mr. Rangel. But he threw up an odd comment when pressed about Alcorn's statements. "The problem we have (is) that we have professional Jewish people who make a living out of searching out anti-Semitism," said the congressman. "And they find it easier to reach out and to get some black that's out of step with the rest of the black community, and to point that out as being black anti-Semitism, when they know throughout our country we have anti-Semitism coming from whites that are more powerful and do more damage, but they don't single them out."
I can only ask Mr. Rangel wether or not there are "professional black people" who search out prejudice against blacks, sometimes rightfully so, but sometimes without regard for truth and real justice. Al Sharpton comes to mind, right there in Harlem. Once again it seems a Democrat is making charges of white anti-semitism being more prevalent than that from blacks.
Well, lets ask an expert... Anti-Defamation League Director Abe Foxman recently said "The facts are that unfortunately, anti-Semitism is significantly more prevalent in the African-American community than with any other group."
Meanwhile, on ABC's This Week, Jesse Jackson vouched for Lieberman, but insisted others might not be so sanguine. "Now here's a Jewish person who must meaningfully address Protestant groups and Muslim groups and give them a sense of comfort on the question," said Jackson, reiterating his own belief, "I'm convinced he can pass that kind of loyalty test."
I'm sorry, but I don't recall any prominent Protestant leaders having questioned Lieberman's loyalties, electablility, or fitness to govern. And then Jackson went even further when pressed about Farrakhan's questioning of Lieberman's patriotism.... "He is not the one who has raised that question. After all, Catholics have raised the question and Southern Baptists and the Christian Coalition, in fact, raised the question. But (Lieberman) can answer the question. That's the good news."
When has a Catholic, a Southern Baptist or a Christian raised the question? I'd really like to know. We've had the head of the Dallas NAACP do it, and now Louis Farrakhan. But Jackson and Rangel see anti-semitism where none has emerged in order to distract from the real anti-semitism in their own back yard.
I'm sure no one is surprised, however, that Farrakhan weighed in against Lieberman given his long history of anti-semitic vitriol. Perhaps Lieberman [and the Democratic party so dependent on the black vote]can take solace in the fact that it's only Farrakhan, and those like Rangel and Jackson are supporting him.
But then, a 1995 survey by Essence magazine revealed that it's African-American readers named Louis Farrakhan as their most popular political leader.
For those of your readers who hold out hope for Gore/Lieberman the numbers don't look good. Among likely voters, the latest Gallup/CNN/USA Today poll shows Bush up 55% to 39%. Nader's support has dropped precipitously, but it has not helped Gore. More ominously, 47% percent of those likely voters said there is no chance they will vote for Gore.
With these kind of numbers, there is only one way Gore can win. He has to go completely negative on Bush. Look for an ugly fall campaign from the Democratic ticket.
Lynn vs Chaim
Russell writes: A higher murder rate among African Americans doesn't refute Lynn's argument given that the vast majority of black men who are in jail are there not for violent crime but for drug offenses. Crediting an increase in prison population for the drop in violent crime is fallacious since virtually all of that increase is for drug posession and sale. Your point about genetics is well taken though -- we slavering, violent, lust-crazed men are the biggest proven genetic threat. Sorry, Chaim. Lynn may have some opinions that you disagree with, but she can out-reason you any day of the week. And I think brains, attitude, and sexual assertiveness are sexy as hell.
Chaim: I pointed to murder because it is the crime for which the best statistics are available and the crime that most clearly reflects the degree of respect the individual (or group) has for others. If you are willing to kill, you likely are willing to commit every lesser crime as well.
But let's look again at Lynne's argument. Implicit in her (and Russell's) line of reasoning is the assumption that the drug trade is a pretty mellow affair run by peaceful folk who are merely trying to make their way in the world. Well, I do not know about your city, but in the cities I am most familiar with (New York, D.C.), the drug trade is the most violent criminal activity there is, and the source of the lion's share of murder, mayhem and urban fear. The pushers who are caught on possession charges are directly involved in that violent trade and deserve to go to prison. Certainly most of the killings in D.C. in the 80's were the work of its especially murderous crack dealers, many of whom ended up in prison on possession charges (as did its Mayor, Marion Berry). Perhaps if they went about their business in a less violent manner there would not have been so much public pressure that the police nail them on possession wherever possible.
I suppose legalizing crack and heroin would reduce the number of black folk rotting away in our prisons, but there is not much support for that in white - or black - America. And any move that would make hard drugs even more widely available in America would not be likely to reduce the rate at which black men rape (also disproportionately high) or smash bricks into the heads of pedestrians. The grim truth is that black americans commit a very over-sized share of the violent crime in this country (as evidenced by the murder statistics); any rational system of justice that is applied even-handedly will inevitably send disproportionately many black men to prison. If black men committed disproportionately fewer violent crimes and STILL were over-represented in prison, Lynne would have an argument. But the facts are otherwise.
Crazy Candy Apples
Zee: luke...what is deal with candy apples
Zee: i ran into her on saturday...she is insane
Luzdedos1: how so?
Zee: just wild...i have seen a lot of party girls, but she seemed to
be on another level.
Zee: i was talking to her for 2 mins before she mentioned that she was
in a gay orgy...is that her style. i have seen her on film before, but
dindt know she was in that genre...
Luke's Troubles
LF: It's like I am seeking external validation for the lack of respect that I have for myself. Am I attracted to women who don't respect me? Women who diss me?
Rachel Porner: I think you try to act odd in front of them because you want them to be repulsed by you.. When you say you have no social skills, you project that upon yourself. If you behaved with these women like you do in front of Jim DiGiorgio and me, you'd be in good shape. Think back to the Wildlife/Rainbow party - your social skills were on full blast and I think it was because you felt really comfortable with us, your friends. Know why? Because you gave yourself time to become friends with us and didn't push it and expect it to happen overnight. Let's think of a couple of people you seem at ease with - John Douglas, Kendra, Jim, me... I think with us, you put on no airs, act naturally and stop trumpeting Luke F-rd the Jerk.
LF: I often feel that I am living in a way that is not respect worthy. Therefore, I respect those who disrespect me and I disrespect those who respect me..?
RP: This has been an issue with you for a while. Again, the friends I mentioned above may not always respect you (and who cares what Fishbein, Hampshire, Hirsch et al think of you) but they certainly like you and have always said that your behavior is not always kind.
LF: How can I ever expect women to respect me when I am not living in a way that I respect?
RP: If you don't like what you represent, it may be time to change. If only for your well-being and no thoughts to what anyone else in this world thinks of you, even your family. If you are comfortable and happy with who you are, good relationships with family, friends and lovers come easily.
Lynne writes: Punkin, women who hold respectable jobs in polite society do not find funky, tempramental artsy types, like you, any more attractive than you find that same type. You don't like yourself. You have low self-esteem. Women who have something in common with you have the same things "wrong" with them that you find wrong in yourself. It is part of the pathology. Either you learn to value and accept yourself for what you are (which is pretty damn stupendous, Luke) or you change yourself and become the person you admire. But don't pretend there's a dilemma here, when there isn't.
Furthermore, and we've discussed this, if I (for example only, dear) went out and got a respectable job in polite society, you still wouldn't be attracted to me in "that way." Because it isn't the job or the activities -- it is that any woman who likes YOU is obviously crazy, therefore, how could you find her attractive and desirable? On the other hand, if they DON'T like you, they have their head on straight and are smart, so you want them.....
You want external validation...and there's very little of that in this world -- it needs to come from inside. You do attract witty, intelligent quality etc people -- just don't want them after you attract them. They have the wrong job, wrong this, wrong that, a mole on the left buttock rather than the right -- in other words, it's all irrelevant. You aren't whole inside, have nothing to give...are confused.
Dennis Prager Dropped in Sacramento for being a liberal on porn
Luke-- I can't tell if you love or hate Dennis Prager, but we lost him today in the Sacramento Market. Here is what happenned this morning: ---Alan C. Miller, Davis, CA
I called the station, and was told by the woman who answered the phone that Prager was dropped because Prager was not conservative on all issues. When I asked what this meant they said Prager was liberal in regards to pornography! They said their mission statement forbids them from allow Prager on the air because Prager is liberal on pornography. She implied that Prager had promised to be conservative on all issues when Prager signed up with the station, as if Prager had violated that contract.
I said Prager said that some people have trouble with it, while others don't, much like alcohol. As I recall Prager said he subscribed to Playboy. Regardless, Prager is hardly a liberal. My main complaint was that they could take such a wise, conservative man such as Prager and banish him for taking a perceived liberal stand on one issue. I said that wasn't conservative, that was CLOSED MINDED. In fact, the woman stated that it was in Pragers' own words that Prager said he was liberal on pornography. I wonder if Prager said this in a relative sense, and they just took the literal word "liberal" and that's all it took for them. From the way this woman used the word 'conservative,' it had the ring of being a knee-jerk word with no heart behind it. The word seems more important than the meaning behind it.
The woman further stated that they weren't the only station that had dropped Prager "as far as I know." I asked about Pragers' ratings, and she said they were very low, and that they had been receiving many complaints about Prager for his liberal views! I'm wondering where the people who run this station are coming from? I also thought it was odd I wasn't passed on to programming, which is who usually handles these issues. Having a receptionist who obviously didn't agree with Prager's views answering the phone is rather odd. These sound like extremely closed minded people to me. Let me share our email exchange from the day I first found Prager on KTKZ, just days after I found Prager on KABC on the internet.
At 3:56 PM -0700 8/17/99, Alan C. Miller wrote: >I became a fan when I saw you on Tom Snyder--you speak as a >conservative from the heart, not from politics. I indentify with >how you view the world, and now believe I may be more conservatively >minded myself. Last week I obtained unlimited internet access, >largely when I discovered I could hear you on KABC this way. Then I >just discovered our new station KTKZ 1380 Sacramento is now carrying >you. Finally I can hear you!
At 9:09 PM -0700 8/17/99, Dennis Prager wrote: >I'm delighted to have you. Please tell KTKZ about your feelings if you get >the chance. >Since you feel as you do, I hope you get to read some of my writings -- >newsletter and books. >Dennis