Sunday, February 20, 2000
Axle writes: why all the outrage on your site when an actress refuses to f--- african americans, but mr. marcus declaring he won't f--- fat people is met with silence? shouldn't EVERYONE have the right to f--- who they want without being hassled? has porno really become as blandly pc as the rest of society?
Steve Neece writes: It seems like there has been an outbreak of gaybashing these last couple of weeks. First we had paranoid rants by XXX and another fella whose name I can't remember on Gene Ross' site regarding the possibility of talking to a man instead of a woman in cybersex sites and that Rob Black was a traitor to red blooded misogyny by bringing out a new gay line.Porners routinely throw out accusations of gayness at one another in their feuds such as the Spallone-Bo dust up as if that were the ultimate crime/character flaw. Now they are bashing Mr. Marcus. Mr. M says he does everything except fats and passive anal sex. Does that mean he sucks cock and rims assholes? No reason why not, just wanna know. He may find himself with more trade than he can handle. And why would 100 women line up at Sharon Mitchell's door at this late date? THINK,ASSHOLE, your homophobia is showing! It is my hunch that a lot of straight guys do gay porn not only for the money but because of the tremendous ego gratification of being worshipped as a demigod. Gay porn stars are far more accepted in the gay community that straight porners of either gender are in mainstream society. Lastly, what is the big deal about Dolly Golden wearing a crucifix in a sex scene? You saw it frequently in the 70's & 80's and Jill Kelly often as not is wearing one in her scenes. Remember, a disproportionate percentage of female talent was raised in Catholicism so this should not be surprising . After all, they can confess their "sins" and go out and do it again and be forgiven again in an endless cycle .
John writes: Luke, On the website www.Risque.com, there is a interview with Shayla. In it she talks about her fantasy of wanting to do a scene where she is a sex slave to a black couple and treated harshly by both (a la Rough Sex 1/2?). Let's see she had been in the biz for about 8 years (with hundreds of scenes) and never done an interracial? My theory is and this is one we see so often is that she just turned 30, which is porn years is a senior citizen and feeling the impact of the new gals taking over, she goes for antics she never did before. Think twice about this one Shayla, it is obvious to your fans who you are certain to loose that you are making a big mistake. Stay the gumdrop (Jim Holiday's nickname for her) you always were that is why we love you.
Spallone - Bo Feud
Zycondria writes on RAME: "Hey I am very new to the whole porn internet community. That being said I have been in the industry for 15 years. I was just surfing and I saw on l-keford.com that totally cracked me up!! It seems to me that a guy named Bo, who is a self proclaimed drug dealer had a contract girl named Kendra. Rob, Bo's long time (former friend) took Kendra from Bo, by paying for her plastic surgery!! On l-keford.com they are threating each other like they are John Gotti and Al Capone!!! Can somebody fully explain this story to me because I find it truly fascinating and hilarious!"
Lenscap1 writes: "Being in the industry for 15 years should answer the question for you....many of the people in it are mental midgets....take Kendra for example...she stated she makes about $250,000 a year, and this summer made $40,000 a month hooking at some Neveda whorehouse....yet she has the IRS after her for $2,000 in back taxes.....first off, just cut them a check for 2 grand and get them off your back...and secondly, why tell the world how much you 'earn' (perhaps a lot of it untaxed cash), while the IRS is watching you....? mental midgets."
Brian writes: I guess Bo must really have the dirt on Spallone because all of a sudden Spallone claims they buried the hatchet... I'd like to see the pictures.
James DiGiorgio: "We made him an offer he couldnt confuse... If ya put draino up bo's ass there'd be enuff xtasy come out to take care of everyone at the next Woodstock. Over or not...hez still a piece of s--- cocksucker in my book"
Craig Vasiloff writes: "Got a call from Rob Spallone today asking about the deal I made with Bo. According to Rob, Bo had flown to Toronto to meet with me and we had made a deal where I purchased the Kendra Jade film. Didn't happen. Then this evening I get a call from Kendra. "Bo just called and left a message saying he just taked with you and the deal was done. Are you sure this is what you want?" Didn't happen."
Alexandria Quinn
A porner left me this message: "I was reading your site and you had some pictures of Alexandria Quinn. My old friend... What is she doing now? Is she in CA? Is she back f---ing blacks now? She used to love to f--- blacks. She stopped for a long time. She looks like she's taking it up the ass again and she loves that. She could take a telephone pole up her ass."
Luke: "I talked to Chuck Martino this week. Alexandria Quinn is staying with him."
Geronimo writes: THIS GUY WHO IS BEDING ALEXANDRIA!!!ANAL ///QUINN IS HE THE SAME GUY WHO WAS ON A SHOOT IN ARAZONA FOR CHARLIE BIGGS I WAS WORKING FOR KENNY/G /AND HE COULD NOT GET HIS DICK UP /// HE WAS TRYING TO f--- SUSAN HART/// WHAT A JOKE HE IS THIS WAS 15 YEARS AGO HE MUST BE 40 BY NOW //MAYBE DIANEWILL f--- HIM ///HA HA
MM writes: you printed address that listed steve hirsch and his little brother who is a nice guy and NOT in porn. he is in radio. shame on you cause he was freaked to see his address on your site. he is not able to fend off the crazy people
Luke: That was wrong of me. Let me find it and take it down.
Luke's Date
Charley writes Sunday morning: "Was that NJG you were with last night at the Redondo Beach pier? Where did you two go after that? I was going to say hi to you, but my wife said not to bother you because you were on a date. I recognized you from the pictures of you on your site, then you asked your date if she had read a story on your site, which confirmed your identity to me. Anyway, I was going to tell you that I read your site everyday (sometimes several times a day) and to keep up the good work. I haven't been to Redondo Beach in 15 years, and I literally run into Luke F-rd. Wow, what a small world."
Luke: "Thanks for your sweet note. I am really touched. Being pathetically hungry for attention, your note made me feel like a Hollywood celebrity.
"It was my first time on the Redondo Beach Pier, after six years in LA. I was with a nice Jewish girl but not The Nice Jewish Girl. Afterwards we went to California Pizza Kitchen. I know how to show a girl a good time. And thanks for your discretion. It probably would've been fine to say hi but sometimes on a date, it is the last thing I want. But if you see me discussing my site with a date, then it's probably fine to say hi. But use language appropriate for when ladies are around. I remember Veronica Hart saying she only ever had one bad experience with a fan. Some guy came up to her when she was walking with her two kids. And the guy started bubbling over about how great she was at sucking cock.
"BTW, if I am now a celebrity, I should give my political views. I was excited about the Steve Forbes candidacy, but will now vote for George Bush."
Nice Jewish Girl writes: "Dear Lukey: Waaaaaa waaaaaa waaaaaa! Geez, that's all I hear from you about on your site! I'm a mess, I'm a mess....when you and I and Kendra were talking that's all you want to talk about. You're a mess, you're going to get tested.... Let me play those violins. LOUDLY. Luke the truth is, if I may be so blunt, is that you are an upper middle class SPOILED BRAT, who doesn't want to grow up and take responsibility for himself. You've had everything handed to you. You were abused, but no more or less than everyone else in this country. Certainly you were less abused than anyone in the porn biz, you most assuredly came from a more stable background, more love than most of us, though it may not feel that way. The proof? You still talk to your parents every week. How many in the biz do that? Or even, how many Americans do that? Not only that, but they took care of you when you were sick! Many others would have said bye, be homeless when you were sick. And yet, more of that bloody whining, and whinging by you. Enough already. Grow up! Take responsibility for who you are and who you've become. It's your fault, not your parent's, you're not a poor poverty stricken victim here. And you've never been to jail. So grow up already!"
Lynne writes Luke: "I must confess that being out of contact with you left me adrift without a rudder. Not a moral rudder -- I prefer my own. Off the top of my head I can't define just what you are to me, but I know I've gotten very used to something regular and important in my life and you were out of place!
"I hope you are getting excited about my leaving Los Angeles, if not potentially porno as well. I'll be far, far away, just the way you like it. I can live with my brother and Tobi, so will be relatively safe, and go to school and do science stuff with little furry guys. I want to assure you that none of my decisions about my future have anything to do with you -- it's just a lucky happenstance for you that I'm leaving and I hope you enjoy it.
"I assume by now that you see how the physical is really important to me but, at the same time, it is also very casual. It really is of far more import to you than it is to me. You certainly make a bigger deal out of it. You are far more insistant about s p a c e than I am about physical congress.
"Yet you have so much love coming at you from so many directions ...surely you derive some sustenance from it? You wouldn't really trade all that affection from the beautiful porn girls for a physical relationship with someone who finds you "an object of derision" on account of your chronicles o' porn? You have more self esteem now, no? You are to be respected and admired for your achievements and anyone who can't do that isn't worthy of you.
"I was looking at the Dennis Prager site today [dennisprager.net], almost e-mailed you from there just to remind you that I do occasionally go poking about in Luke-dom. It seems like a long time ago that you made that. You just might actually get turned into a media star and get hugely rich and famous and forget the entire concept of morality altogether. And become common and boring like the rest of them."
Luke: "It is terrific to get another thoughtful, literate, empathic, sensitive letter from you. I am not excited about you leaving LA...but you're right about how I have a thing about space. I am a five on the Enneagram."
Lynne responds: I don't mean you should be glad I'm leaving, as in getting out of your hair and obviating the problem my physical presence causes -- I mean you should be excited about our friendship entering a realm in which something which makes you uncomfortable obviated itself for all the best of reasons into circumstances with which you are familiar and, if I may, cozy...
Physical proximity doesn't seem to be something you currently require or desire in a relationship and even though my every material fibre is impregnated (sorry) with tantric energy, physical proximity with the opposite sex is, 99% of the time, apparently not in my personal best interest. Society doesn't respect what I am, and I'm vulnerable enough as it is without making the yahoos feel sex crazy and inferior. Fortunately I will be living with my brother, who is a biker, very muscular and tattooed after federal prison, and with whom no one f---s. And I shall have zillions of animals to kiss and pet and love and hug.
Don't buy the picket fence myth. You are obviously intended for something far more unique and special. You just don't know what it is. (How about separate atolls in the Pacific? Yours can keep Kosher and mine can barbeque whole porkers for Tobi. And I wouldn't dare trust you on the open ocean with a canoe!) We started off here together in the same city because it was essential we build a relationship around pornography before we could have a friendship based on our selves. You have been with me every minute of the last year, and, despite all the really horrific changes and betrayals I've undergone, our friendship has been constant and my work on it consistant. This is what I mean by "you've kept me centered."
If anyone would claim an understanding of how one could be loved "spiritually," it would be you, Luke. You are well versed in theology. "God" doesn't require a physical presence, despite believers' constant demands for proof
A great article here on the porn web. Here's an excerpt: "Database management for a successful Website business is complex. For an adult site, with its typically elaborate partnership arrangements, data handling can become an incredible morass. So Web operators increasingly turn to third parties to manage their membership lists and billing. A billing company will install its credit-card billing system on a Website so the Webmaster can accept Visa, MasterCard, American Express, and online checks. Recurring billing is a standard option, as long as subscribers have the ability to cancel at any time. Webmasters can be given the ability to partially manage their subscriber base, issuing renewals, changing passwords, or canceling memberships. They are not, however, allowed access to their subscribers' credit-card numbers.
"One obvious advantage is that the site operator need not have its own merchant accounts; its charges are processed through the billing companies' accounts. Ideally, this eliminates Webmaster worries about account limits or chargebacks. The basic charge for these services runs from 10 to 15 percent of the transaction amounts. While roughly triple the charges a mainstream business would pay for billing services, these are standard in the adult industry and reflect the increased risks of fraud and chargebacks."
Mitch writes: The audiotext had a shakedown like this, and they survived. Eventually Visa/ Mastercard will be legislated on how they are conducting business and discriminating and all will be well again. Many things are in the works. The best thing one can do is use their own merchant account so they do not rely on the fate of others.
02/15/00 1. Will Web800 discontinue processing credit card transactions? As you are already aware, Web800 has been unable to process Visa transactions since December 27, 1999. Web800 has also not processed new transactions of any kind since January 31, 2000. Web800 will continue to process Mastercard and American Express renewals until further notice, however we are in the process of winding down all business relating to transaction processing.
2. What will happen to my VISA members if I do not take them to another processor? Your members will continue to be active unless you request a nonrenew of the database. The members will NOT be charged, if a nonrenew is requested the DMR expire must be actively running on your server to remove user names from your password files.
3. Can I have my Mastercard and American Express databases? Your Mastercard and American Express databases can be released on your behalf to an alternate third party processor. A hold calculation will be ran for your account to determine if your account has sufficient funds to cover all credits, chargebacks, fines, and fees that can be expected based on your prior account activity. If it is determined that Web800 is holding sufficient funds from your account to cover credits, chargebacks, fines and fees, or you are willing to provide Web800 with the appropriate reserve required, your databases will be released upon our receipt of the properly signed release and non-disclosure documents.
4. Why would I owe additional money to retrieve my Mastercard and American Express databases when I haven't been paid for a month? The VISA database was released with no holds, therefore all fines, fees and returns are accessed against the Mastercard and American Express database. All accounts are evaluated based on their historical account activity as it relates to credits, chargebacks, fines and fees.
Hustler Erotic Video Guide
I picked up the April edition of Hustler Erotic Video Guide (HEVG). It features Alisha Klass on the cover. Page three shows a graphic photo of Alisha urinating. Pages four and five describe the contents of the issue and include five hardcore shots of sexual penetration (something not seen in American mens magazine until recently because of fear of obscenity prosecution).
Pages eight and nine contain an article on IA2000. Here's an excerpt: "Although X-rated Ineternet sites are by definition "porn-based," in fact there is still little connection between the porn-video industry and the porn-Internet industry. The former is controlled by crooks, the latter by computer geeks..." A net porner says his colleagues are just numbers counters. They note the number of hits and clicks, then make bank deposits.
On page ten, Marc Medoff writes about Max Hardcore's recent march through Eastern Europe. A photo shows Max urinating into the mouth of a brunette. Medoff describes the negotiations between Hardcore and a Czech Republic porn agent who makes two quick points: one, that half of his girls have already heard of Max and will not work for him; and two, that those who do not know of him will have to be lied to, to get them through the shoot. Then they will never work for him again.
Max f---s a blonde named Nina so hard that she cries and bleeds. Then over her protests, he urinates into her mouth. Medoff says Max pays the girls about $200 each.
Medoff describes Max as a drunk. A mean verbally abusive drunk.
Page 16 shows Alisha Klass anally fisting herself.
On page 33, a photo shows veteran French blonde Dolly Golden, wearing a crucifix, while getting anally penetrated.
HEVG editor Michael Louis Albo interviews French porn actress Rebecca Lord. Here's an excerpt:
Albo: "Now, this is a strange issue - I recall reading on the Internet recently, and I know so much of the stuff on the Internet is not true - but people were saying that you were running an escort service."
Lord: "Okay, let me get this straight - I think that rumor came through Luke F-rd's Web Site. Because I started to hear that and I ran into him at VSDA and I said you better take that out because you can get in a lot of trouble doing that, making up some bulls--- about me."
Albo: "Did he take that out?"
Lord: "He took it out and I heard from a friend of mine that he just put it back."
Albo: "I'm not surprised."
Lord: "Oh really?"
Albo: "Yeah, he's an awful person."
Lord: "He's such an asshole. It's because he jsut tries to give a lot of people a bad image or a bad reputation based on things that are just untrue. You know what he said? He said that all the Vivid Girls have AIDS. I mean one day that guy's going to end up in the hospital."
Brian writes about Kristine DeBell: What about this actress, She played a major role in Meatballs with Bill Murray. She did an X rated flick called Alice in Wonderland around that time. There is an r rated version and a x rated version. Ive seen full clips on the web and they are great.
Taliesin on Boxcovers
Taliesinthebard.com writes on RAME: "Sometimes after the video is shot but before it is edited, the box cover may be prepared. (Sometimes a tape is edited first or the two things are going on simultaneously by two different departments at the same company.) However, for this example, let's say the box is prepared first and pictures from all the scenes are put on the box. Then during the editing of the video it's discovered that there was a malfunction or some other problem with the camera that happened during the shoot but no one knew it at the time. A scene was ruined, maybe the tape of the scene was lost. The box is already done and thousands of copies of it have been printed. The producer is not going to re-do the box and reprint it because of the cost. It may not be fair to the viewer but it's a legitimate reason. If a producer is deliberately tying to trick viewers into buying or renting a movie, that's wrong. Write to produces who you think are doing this and complain.
"Not quite the same thing, but when we were filming "Robert McCallum's Ecstasy" for Western Visuals. Tiffany Million, Mike Horner, Sara Jane Hamilton and I were on location in San Francisco. There's an important scene with dialogue that I deliver to Mike about Sara that I say as we are walking down a street. I kept blowing my lines. I couldn't get it right until the tenth take. After we got back to LA it was discovered that none of that film was with us. Gone. Disappeared. It happens. Fortunately the sound technician had my lines on audio tape and he was able to dub them in over some choppy quick edits of Sara and Mike on the streets of SF, but the actual scene is lost. It was a feature film but it still would have been too expensive to get all of us back to SF just for those few lines. You won't notice the odd cuts and patched-in dialogue unless you're looking for it. It's a good movie; you might want to check it out."
Luke Gets Mail
Marc Putative writes from Toronto, Canada: " luke--thanks for the props on your site regarding talk640...i caught your interview with marsha lederman; i used to work at that station as an on-air host (going on 4 years ago) and know marsha from then. now i comment about the station, rather than comment for them, on a site called RadioDigest.com (where my weekly local radio rant may or may not bear a resemblance to the cadence your column on the average week). knowing you'd be on the show i actually sent marsha a few notions of what to ask you about, none of which came up on-air (except for a passing mention of kendra jade), so i was a little miffed. (i mean, i wanted to hear the latest scoop on njg, etc.). yet, the use of the term "mamzer" on-air was certainly inspired. anyway, if you've got enough money to burn, you really should trek up to toronto. there's enough desperate media up here for you to plug your book and endeavors. i even know a nifty shul you can attend.
Haunt_bea@hotmail.com writes: Those of us who study X are keenly aware that much research remains to be done, many questions remain unanswered. The temptation is to give in to broad stereotypes. Here are a few of the questions I would like to see research focused on by my fellow sex researchers:
Why are the women most willing to work in the sex industry, at least over a long time, almost universally bi/lesbian? Anyone watching Jerry Springer, let alone interviewing these women, knows they are openly bi/lesbian. Is it perhaps even possible they go into the sex industry in order to come out sexually?
Lesbians seem to fall into 2 visible categories: those who dress like men, and those who are comfortable indulging their feminity.
Strippers and porn actresses obviously fall into the second class of women who don't mind being looked at sexually by men. How can we explain that some women hate being looked at by men (to the extreme of dressing like men), while others seem to publicly thrive on male attention? Keeping in mind that most male consumers (of pornography, strip bars, etc) are married and heterosexual, why do they prefer bi/lesbians?
What is special about this segment of men that they prefer to watch women who are known to be bi/lesbian? Why do they not feel threatened by these women and see them as vicious competitors? Since most of these men also have wives or girlfriends, how do their wives and girlfriends feel about their men watching lesbian sex on film? Do they watch it along with their men? How do they understand the fact that their men are aroused by it?
Questions like these are pivotal to the success of the Playboy Channel, for example. Which couples are likely to experiment with threesomes, and how frequently do men lose their women to the third woman in a threesome? This is a common scenario on Jerry Springer. How often does it happen in real life? The above girl-girl question matters because it is absolutely basic to the sex industry as we know it today.
Today's sex industry is altogether driven by that special breed of men who are seeking out bi/lesbians. Who are they? What effects, if any, would such knowledge have on the sex industry? Might the sex industry even be revolutionized by a clear understanding of these dynamics?
I am currently researching the above, and may be personally contacted at either hauntbea@hotmail.com or haunt_bea@hotmail.com, or you may respond directly to luke@lukeisback.com.
Andy Griffith writes: By the way, I believe your article is the first time the word bi/lesbians has been coined in the annals of sex industry history. Another l-keford.com first!
Here are my own deep answers to the hetero male/ bi-lesbian paradox: Which married hetero males get off on bi/lesbian sex, and which bi/lesbians enjoy performing for hetero male audiences?
Freud got it right! According to Freud, healthy psychosexual development means the male successfully possesses his mother only vicariously by identifying with a strong heterosexual father, and for females it means successfully possessing her father only by identifying with a strong heterosexual mother.
So here's what's happening with these hetero males and bi/lesbians performers:
These married hetero males never successfully identified with their fathers(to possess their mothers), and these bi/lesbians never successfully identified with their mothers (to possess their fathers).
So both the hetero males and bi/lesbian females have not only failed to complete their psychosexual development, they have found alternative, immature, deviant ways to solve the problem of possessing their other-sex parent: the male imagines he becomes a female like his mother in order to possess his mother sexually(so he identifies with the female performing sex on another female), and the bi/ lesbian imagines she possesses a phallus in order to imagine she has become like her father and thereby successfully possess her father.
In the above cases, the hetero male has actually identified(psychosexually) with his mother, and the bi/lesbian has identified with her father instead of the other way around! This explanation is as unbelievable yet true as when it was first proposed by Freud himself almost a century ago.
By the way, a similar dynamic applies to men who are aroused by anal sex with women, except that these men are displacing repressed hostility towards their mothers by performing a degrading, subjugating act upon a female. In both cases, bi/lesbian and anal sex, these men are psychosexually immature, having never identified with a strong heterosexual father, and are looking for alternative ways of sexually possessing their mothers.
For a full explanation of these fascinating dynamics, I refer the reader to psychoanalyst Elaine V. Siegel's book, Female Homosexuality: Choice Without Volition: A Psychoanalytic Study. Dr Siegel actually found that 50% of the lesbians referred to her for treatment(by a lesbian support group) became fully heterosexual when they were ultimately able to identify with her as the strong, heterosexual mother they had never known. In other words, they were able to complete their psychosexual development and become fully and permanently heterosexual, at which point the lesbian support group angrily stopped referring new patients to Dr Siegel! You won't believe me if you don't read this fascinating book!
Laura writes: Luke I think your psychoanalysis of BI/lesbians and hetero men who enjoy watching them is a crock. In fact far from being abnormal all hetero men love watching women have sex with each other so therefore it must be perfectly natural and doesn't require any psychological study. Secondly as far as the women themselves are concerned I am increasingly beginning to believe that all women are born capable of bisexual tendencies whether they realize it or not. How else do you explain strippers or porn stars, many of whom weren't or at least didn't realize they were bisexual prior to thier entry into the business suddenly develope that way? So therefore far from being "deviant" as you claim, bisexual/lesbian feelings are actually normal and natural. And finally with regards to the 50% of lesbians who supposedly became heterosexual from undergoing therapy, it only proves they stopped living lesbian lifestyles, it doesn't prove they actually stopped having lesbian desires just that that chose to suppress them, and it could also be that those women were actually bisexual rather than strictly lesbian therefore able to have heterosexual relationships. Also how do you explain the other 50% that didn't convert. Anyway I don't believe in those phony therapies that supposedly convert gays into straights. BTW lesbian scenes are the only reason to watch porn.
Fischel Attends Conservative Shul
Fischel writes: Shalom Chaver! This evening I attend a conservative shul for the first time. No mechitza between men and women, what a world. this modern way gives Fischel a new idea for big money on the internet that modern orthodox and conservadox jews will enjoy. Why not, in addition to a list of all suspected mamzers, a place where jewish women can go and post their monthly cycles so that jewish men who sleep with them can be sure that they are not impure?
I just wanted to clear up something you said on your web site. I tthink you said that mamzers were not jewish. Not so! They are jewish, but jews who are not mamzers may not marry them, or any of their descendants for many generations, because they are morally traif. Such pitiful creatures are the "untouchables" of judaism. That is why a web site that identifies such creatures would be an especially big mitzvah.
From NYPost.com, Neal Travis: IT'S a wonder Kirk Douglas, still recovering from that stroke, made it through his latest movie, "Diamonds." According to his co-star, busty bimbo Jenny McCarthy, she gave him an on-set lap dance for his 80th birthday party. "I wanted to give him something special," Jenny tells the March issue of Maxim magazine. "We even got pictures of me shaking my booty in his face. I figured, what the hell, when you turn 80, wouldn't you want some little hottie to give you a lap dance?"
The actress is very up-front about getting breast implants. "I was 19, when I was really insecure," she says. "I was already a perky C-cup, but I thought big boobs equals sexy. But bigger isn't always better. I'm happy with them now, actually. They're not really hard -- there's plenty of bounce going on."
Who Wants To Marry A Millionaire?
Fiona posted to alt.showbiz.gossip: As you may recall, the "multi-millionaire" groom on the Who Wants To Marry A Multi-Millionaire show has a part-time residence in Vancouver. Yesterday, the Vancouver Province had a column by Peter Clough full of stories - all bad - that people had to tell about Rick Rockwell, the groom. One woman who was quoted went on a date with him about three weeks ago. She met him through Internet personal ads and he called her when he was in Vancouver. She says she "felt uncomfortable with him from the start" because he mostly talked about the "long term relationship" he was looking for. He "made his move" within half an hour (the old "oh, you've got a bad back, let me give you a massage" routine) and she told him to back off. "I didn't find him attractive at all. I thought he was trying to get laid, basically." Apparently Rockwell is also well known among real estate agents in Vancouver for wasting their time. One said, "He's a flake - a loser type of guy". He visits Vancouver every two months or so and is (in)famous for "playing the big shot" - getting agents to spend days driving him around to look at properties, when all he has ever bought is a "low-end condo that leaks". Another agent says, "He's a womanizer. He's weird and geeky." This same agent says he met two of Rockwell's Vancouver girlfriends, both from the suburbs, who said they met him through voice personals and the Internet. The agent says he thought it was kind of weird that Mr. Multi-Millionaire asked him to drop one of them off at the rapid transit station. The woman who went on the date with him says she gives the marriage less than a year - as soon as the TV bride discovers that the multimillionaire has a comb-over.
From the NY Post: Rick Rockwell -- the grinning bachelor who hooked a bride on "Who Wants to Marry a Multi-Millionaire?" -- physically abused and threatened to kill his ex-fiancee, court documents charge. Debbie Goyne got a restraining order against Rockwell nine years ago after she broke their engagement and he got violent, according to the papers obtained by 'Net Web site thesmokinggun.com. A Los Angeles judge barred Rockwell from going near Goyne after she testified that her "repeated attempts to break off an engagement" led Rockwell to assault her and threaten that "he would find me and kill me," the Web site reported.
Chaim Amalek writes Luke: Yep, you have been milking the "I am a millionaire who almost appeared in the eponymous FOX show but did not make it" with great elan. Were you a stock, I would say that you had forward momentum at this point. Which means that you have to push even harder now, both for your sake and CV's (how many years removed from the pale of settlement is that guy?).
Next step: Take fuller advantage of your location in southern California to milk the many opportunities for exposure in your own back yard. Example: Why shouldn't you appear on some cable shows in need of a minor celebrity or two, like "Win Ben Stein's Money"? Or, for that matter, why not try to pitch the "Millionaire" angle to any of the multitude of television talk/freak fests that are taped in LA? (Do you have an agent?) At the very least, this exposes you to some of the machers of the LA-TV-Hollywood-Jewish world. Maybe you could pitch them the concept of a TV show based on the efforts of a POOR Aussie, the son of a minister, to find his way in LA etc. (Might be best to drop the Jewish angle.)
OK I am free associating now (well, not really, but close enough to it). We all know that the networks are A. desperate for a hit and B. shameless in copying one another. Here is an angle to pitch a show that would use you, Luke. "Who Wants to Marry an Internetmillionaire Nerd". I recently read that the high-tech nerd-istans of Silicon Valley and Northern Virginia have a serious shortage of women, and that many of those stock option millionaires, who are almost all male, are having a devil of a time finding suitable mates. Why not a television show that seeks to pair off an internet millionaire with a spouse? Perhaps you could pitch yourself as such a nerd millionaire in need of a spouse. The fact that this woman must also be jewish would only serve to increase the poignancy of the situation.
On the other hand, if she were to be a shiksa, you could marry her in a civil ceremony without any halachik consequences. She would then at most be your pelegesh. By the way, did Mossad ever get around to interviewing you? A little more exposure in the New York market (some important New York Jews read his paper) couldn't hurt. Chaim Amalek
Luke: Yes, Mossad interviewed me last week and the story should be up in a week.
Chaim: PS Here is a special message to the remaining gentile porners out there. YOU ARE FINISHED. Simply put, you do not have the cognitive skills to go head-to-head against the smart ashkenazic jews who are thinking about eating your lunch. Sure, you will be permitted to retain an interest in the dirtier aspects of the business that jews do now want to soil themselves with, but so far are the really lucrative aspects go, you might as well just give up right now. It is over for you.
PPS Luke, once you succeed in ghettoizing porn by making its production and distribution more fully jewish in the public mind, it will be that much easier for you to achieve your goal of destroying it and the secular jewish culture that defends it.
"The babe in his cradle is closing his eyes The blossom embraces the bee. But soon, says a whisper 'ARISE, ARISE'! Tomorrow belongs to me! Oh Fatherland Fatherland show us the sign, Your children have waited to see. The morning will come when the world is MINE Tomorrow belongs to me!" --Fred Ebb Gut yontif to all .
Here's an excerpt from the Marsha Lederman show on Talk640.com in Toronto Friday afternoon.
Fischel Teitenbaum phones: "I'm curious how you reconcile your Judaism, which you make much of on your website, with the mechanics of picking out a bride on national television. First, how would you know that any of these women were Jewish? Second, could you really marry a woman without speaking to her in advance? Suppose she turned out to be a mamzer?"
Luke: "A mamzer in Jewish Law is a bastard and can never enter the people Israel. I'd be condemned to marriage to someone who could never become Jewish."
Marsha: "You should do this on Israeli television. This is way too Jewish for North America."
Luke: "North America loves Jews... This country has been golden to us... Anyone living in an organized religion and in the world is going to be constantly facing temptation and challenges... And in the final analysis, this Fox TV wedding is just a secular wedding, it is not a religious Jewish wedding, and therefore doesn't count."
Holly Body At Golden Eyes
Kennybe writes: DAY 1 well, the weekend started early on friday night. i decided to go check out Holly Body at that new club Golden Eyes [in Arcadia]. has anyone else been there?? wow, the places they will put clubs. actually, it doesnt look that bad for an industrial area, plenty of street parking and a detached lot, just in case. FYI, i tried to use the half price coupon from the paper, but they said its not valid when there is a feature. not that i couldnt afford it, but i thought it was a little picky for a new club trying to build a clientele. and also considering that there was only 3 other guys there when i got in. the club is big inside, but definitely needs some work. for starters, the tip rail is about 6 feet from the stage. i asked if that was a law or something (ala O.C.), but they said no. now add to that, awful lighting, and you got the makings of a bad experience. good points, the sound system is pretty good. and the DJ wasnt annoying (yet). and the girls were a pleasant range from 4-8.5's. unfortunatly for me, the blondes were on the high end, and preference, brunettes on the low end. Holly was great as usual. we had a short chat after her show. she was in a rush to get ready for the next show (she was late for the first one). a nice surprise, Alicia Rio showed up to see the show too. she has been featuring at VB. like i said, im not going to sweat the coupon thing. i probably wont be back there again. to those interested, they are having a grand opening party with Ron Jeremy, Jenteal, Marilyn Chambers, and some other porn star. i think it's on the 3rd.
TARZANA (LA Times) — A Superior Court judge has overturned the recent Los Angeles City Council decision prohibiting a Tarzana bikini bar from going topless, but city officials said Monday they still hope to block the change. Judge Dzintra Janavs ordered the City Council to set aside its Dec. 15 action denying permission for Dino's Show Bar on Oxnard Street to convert to topless dancing. She ruled that the city failed to show that there are other locations in Los Angeles where such a constitutionally protected business could operate legally.
Talk Radio
The only talkshow I listen to regularly is that of Dennis Prager. But I also like Dr. Laura who recently blasted "The Zone," Dr. barry Sears's low carbohydrate diet which Prager endorses.
Turner writes on alt.radio.talk: "Ever since I can remember, Prager has taken the stance that porn is not a contributor to those who commit sex crimes. (rape, molestation, etc.) He doesn't believe that people can get addicted to porn. (does he know the number one sites that are hit on the web?) Since I heard him take that stance originally around 1994 on KABC-L.A. I lost the little bit of respect I had for him. Perhaps he has the addiction."
Many listeners who enjoy Dennis Prager on KABC radio enjoy Phil Hendrie on KFI.
Aaron Gross writes: "The hard part was learning that he [Hendrie] was different from the rest of KFI's regular line-up that tends to say outrageous stuff they don't believe. It reminded me of the coaching my wife and I got before we went on (and won) the Newlywed Game years ago. The producers said flat-out, even if we agreed, to pile on the cheese and escalate any semblence of a spat for the audience. Rule #1: Never back down, even if your partner is right.
"When I learned Hendrie was doing all the voices, I realized it was brilliant. It's hard to imagine his not losing his composure while switching persona. For the uninitiated, Hendrie's show starts with a "guest" (Hendrie through a voice modifier) with an outrageous premise (a school librarian who believes in corporal punishment for children who bring books back late; someone who is striking in support of the UPS drivers, who believes that the drivers ought to be able to honk from the street and have you go and pick up your own parcel; a 2nd grade teacher who has daily "field trips" to local businesses where the children get to "try" the work, like at a dry cleaner, small item assembly, whatever). Invariably, someone not familiar with the show gets sucked in and starts SCREAMING at the guest. One of the gimmicks used is that if someone is really irate, they'll be kept on hold a little while, so they'll be really steamed by the time they get on the air. Hendrie is a genius."
<JimGunn> Frankly I think that this rush to blab evrything about everyone else on the internet gossip sites has gone waay to far, what with all the animosity that circulates and all the utterly preposterous, wromgheaded spitework that gets done. Especially when it's a bunch of childish strangers taking pot shots at each other for absolutely no reason. It's very disturbing.
Paul Barresi
XXX writes: The following article by Jake Enclan (Arts Editor) is
in the current issue of Fab!, a bi-monthly gay news magazine published
in Los Angeles. The magazine's website is out-dated and does not currently
carry this article. The article, much of what is Barresi's personal
interpretation of events is prefaced in brackets with known facts
that contradict statements made in this article.
Fab!
March 3, 2000
PAUL BARRESI: STILL ANGRY AFTER ALL THESE YEARS
Outspoken, opinionated, rebel, snitch...or is he just misunderstood?
Porn actor-director Paul Barresi is one angry man. With 52 films
under his belt and a career that has endured 30 years, Barresi maintains
a quirky love-hate relationship with the adult film industry, the
gay community and Hollywood in general.
He's not your typical gay porn star. First of all - he's not gay.
Secondly, he has probably achieved more mainstream recognition than
most in the adult film industry, however, that probably has more to
do with his JOHN TRAVOLTA connection than his creative endeavors.
After outing John Travolta in the National Enquirer in 1990 <and
receiving $100,000 for his efforts>, life has never been the same
for Barresi, an extremely complex man who seems to be constantly dealing
with issues of acceptance.
On the one hand he complains about being discriminated against in
the gay porn industry and asks why he is not accepted by his
peers. On the other hand, however, he claims that most of the key
players are scum bags, pedophiles and liars - which makes one wonder
why he would even want to be a part of a group he seems to so intensively
dislike.
While disparity seems like it should be his middle name, the truth
of the matter is that Barresi, as shocking as this may seem to
some, gives the impression of an extremely moral, ethical and principled
fellow, more like your favorite gym teacher in high school than an
adult film legend.
Those seeking an answer to the various contradictions in this man's
turbulent career might gain some insight from Barresi's bio. Born
in 1948 in Lynn, Massachusetts, an industrial city north of Boston,
Barresi was the second of four brothers. His father was a high-ranking
civilian employee with the U.S. Navy, and Barresi, educated in Catholic
schools, did his upmost to prove to his family that he was the best
little boy in the world. After graduating from high school, he secured
a wrestling scholarship to the University of Maryland. Later, during
the patriotic "America - Love It or Leave It" days of the
Vietnam war, Barresi left college to join the Air Force.
After his discharge, it seems as though Barresi, like so many other
young men who returned from the battlefields with a different
perspective on life, decided to reach for his true dream. In 1972,
ex-Air Force man and all-around macho guy Paul Barresi headed out
to Los Angeles to become an actor. At first things seemed to be going
his way. He landed a small role in the movie "The Wild Party,"
starring Raquel Welch and James Coco, directed by James Ivory. Like
so many young actors in Hollywood, however, the mainstream roles didn't
seem to be pouring in and Barresi did what he could to make a living.
In 1975, Barresi posed nude for Playgirl magazine and later on, during
the late '70's and '80's, Barresi appeared in several adult films
and videos, mostly straight, some gay. "I have no hang-ups about
straight, gay, bi, or anything else," says Barresi, who is now
married with children. "When I was young and wild, just like
alot of other straight boys, I would just about f--- anything,"
says Barresi, eloquently.
"Had it not been for AIDS," he explains, "bi-sexuality
would be far more accepted today than it is. But the virus threw everybody
in the closet. Everybody kept their own behavior in check because
they didn't want to be branded. That's why alot of closet cases like
John Travolta would only go out with straight men because he was so
fearful of catching AIDS."
Speaking of Travolta, while Barresi clearly doesn't like talking about
this episode in his past, (during our interview Barresi emphasizes
forcefully, that he doesn't think that the subject should be delved
into too deeply) there is no way one can write about the man without
going into one of the most famous outing incidents of the decade.
<It should be noted too, that Barresi came under heavy attack and
threats by the Church of Scientology ~ where Travolta has been a decades-long
member and trumpets its cause in public whenever the opportunity arises
~ and the church's cavalry of church attorneys and P.I.'s.>
"It was not out of jealousy and it was not out of revenge,"
explains Barresi at first, but after a few seconds he recants. "Well
maybe, there was some kind of a vendetta. Let me give it to you straight.
In late 1983 when I was working with John Travolta on the film "Perfect,"
he promised me that I would be his new personal fitness trainer once
his present trainer - Dan Isaacson - leaves. So, in 1990, I went to
see John in Bel Air - he was staying in a hotel <Hotel Bel Air
according to an earlier bio> and he introduced me to a gentleman
that was in his suite and said, "This is my new trainer."
I said, "Really? Nice to meet you," but that pissed me off."
"I was willing, however, to let it go because some years passed
and maybe he'd forgotten the promise he made to me. But the straw
that broke the camel's back was when I was leaving. He handed me the
remnants of the complimentary hotel basket with partially eaten fruit
inside and open packages. The only thing that was intact was the bottle
of Dom Perignon champagne. So I took the champagne and put it on the
shelf in my apartment as a reminder of how demeaning and how cruel
he was to me. To give me leftovers as if he was giving me a gift of
some kind. So, after that, I pondered the idea and I decided to tell
the (National) Enquirer about who Travolta really is."
<Note: Barresi's summation of his experience contradicts earlier
statements made by him, some of which appeared on court record in
1992 in the Church of Scientology v. Fishman & Geertz case, a
legal case defended by former attorney Graham Berry - who later acted
as Barresi's attorney, after Barresi dropped his first attorney, Scientology
lawyer Lawrence Heller..
First, Barresi has previously claimed in his bio and on court record
that he met John Travolta in the shower room of a Beverly Hills gym
and that they became "lovers".
Second, Barresi claims to have in his possession intimate letters
sent to him by John while he was in Thailand and elsewhere on
location and that each of these letters were signed "Love....John".
<< Scientologists are generally known to sign off on their letters
with this or a similar reply>>. While Barresi strenuously objected
last year to a post made Garry Scarff defining Barresi & Travolta's
former relationship as one of "f--- buddies", both Graham
Berry, Garry Scarff and a large crowd of diners at Mark's Restaurant
in West Hollywood were witness to Barresi boldly standing up from
his chair and yelling "I f---ed John Travolta in the ass and
he loved it."
Third, though Barresi claims he bears no ill will towards Travolta,
and claims to be sensitive to the subject of Travolta's letters to
him, this has not stopped Barresi from exploring the idea of selling
the letters to the highest bidder for "a quarter to half a million
dollars.">
The hysterical reaction to the Enquirer's Travolta feature, in which
Barresi revealed their sexual affair, was more, much more, than Barresi
expected. In an interview with the gay mag 'The Guide' in 1998, Barresi
claims that photocopies of the Enquirer article were sent anonymously
<though earlier blaming Scientology agents> to the owners of
his building, every one of his neighbors, every one of his fitness
clients, his parents, and his brothers.
"It just about wrecked my life," Barresi told The Guide.
"My whole world fell apart. My family disowned me. I lost all
but two of my fitness clients. I was barred from almost every gym
in town, and it cost me jobs." In the end, Travolta's attorney
convinced Baressi to issue a retraction and an apology. < This
contradicts earlier sworn testimony by Barresi who claimed he was
being harassed and threatened by Scientology's attorneys and their
chief security officer (and former disgraced LAPD officer) Eugene
Ingram. Barresi also claimed his retraction came with a price. He
claimed to have collected $25,000.>
"I was having a nervous breakdown," Barresi said. "I
just wanted it to be over." However, Barresi told 'The Guide'
that "when the dust settled, I regretted the retraction a lot
more than I regretted the initial call to the Enquirer." <Barresi
has claimed that although he made the profitable retraction, it never
denied the sexual relationship Barresi had with Travolta>.
That tumultuous episode seems to have left a lasting impression on
the former wrestler, former Air Force man. While it seems as
though Barresi felt that Travolta was getting what he deserved, he
never expected the venomous reaction from the local gay
community. Barresi, a man of his word, just wasn't ready to deal with
Hollywood's "love-ya-mean-it" attitude.
Whether it has to do with his heterosexuality or the bad publicity
from the Travolta affair, today, says Barresi, "not one gay-owned
or run manufacturer of gay porn, despite my exceptional track record
of having written, produced and directed over 52 successful gay videos
to date, has hired me. They include All Worlds Video, Hollywood Sales,
Odyssey, and Falcon Studios to name a few." <In 1999, Barresi
ended his association with US Male videos after creative differences
between him and the "owner's boyfriend and assistant, Nick DeMartino."
Barresi now works under the Pacific Sun label>
One of the reasons for the animosity between Barresi and the gay porn
industry, revolves around, it seems, Barresi's moral code, which,
according to him, is quite a few notches higher than the others. Barresi
expounds expansively on the low moral standards in the industry, mentioning
names of directors and producers that, according to him, are guilty
of pedophilia, prostitution and all around sleazy scum behavior.
<Barresi is well-known for his egocentric arrogance and profane
tirades, which was in true form in 1999 when he responded to a 'gay
porn forum' where he was the focus of the discussion... see http://www.atkolvideos.com>
Aside from that, Barresi also has a problem with the subject matter
of some gay videos. "In the gay genre whenever you come up with
a movie that suggests you're having sex with your son, or your father
or relative, I mean the f---ing video is a sell out, and the <gay
porn> critics don't criticize it. But if you co-mingle some good
straight man-to-man sex with scenes that have some violence.... for
example, I did a movie called "The Underboss' and I got so much
f---ing criticism for that. The righteous gay-porn world put that
and me down, and it really pisses me off.... They don't condone that,
but they condone and support incest. Now explain that to me, buddy."
<Barresi fails to mention that theme of many of the gay porn videos
in which he starred placed him as the daddy or authority figure engaging
in sex with young men in the 18-20's crowd.>
While one might think that Barresi might be better off in the world
of straight porn, his ongoing work - writing and directing gay porn
videos - is just one of the many complexities that seem to revolve
around this unique adult video star. In the end, however, it seems
that the real gripe is about acknowledgement, approval and acceptance.
"I'm talking to you because I want to set the record straight
about these people," says Barresi. "Why should I be the
only one that always gets criticized and ridiculed? I'm not recognized
by my peers in the porn industry. I'm discriminated against - maybe
because I live my life as a straight man." <It should be noted
that 25% of those models that appear in gay porn videos claim, like
Barresi, to be straight "gay-for-pay" persons.>
From http://www.atkol.com/forums-forums.asp
PAUL BARRESI
(Posted 7/16/98 9:42:00 PM)
As a porn director of gay video, I think it's time you know that there
are more complainers on the set than you can imagine. They might seem
macho and 'all man' to you on video, but you wouldn't believe how
they behave off the set. If
they didn't have a dick hanging between their legs, you'd swear they
were bitches. That's the facts guys.
mike
(Posted 7/16/98 9:50:00 PM)
Paul, YOU SOUND UPSET, WHAT HAPPENED??
GymJocks
(Posted 7/16/98 10:51:00 PM)
Oh Paul, finally an interesting thread. I so believe you. Now please
dish.
rion
(Posted 7/17/98 1:30:00 AM)
Of course, there's always the possibility that they are fearful of
finding themselves spectacularly in the National Enquirer, courtesy
of Paul "I blab for bux) Bare-assi.
Matt
(Posted 7/17/98 1:37:00 AM)
I might have more sympathy if they were dealing with someone that
was honest.
Hank C Wood
(Posted 7/17/98 1:58:00 AM)
I've just directed three vids this yr... so I don't have the experience
of Paul
Baressi... I have found that there are some guys who are awful pains
--
everything is a problem, everything is an issue... there are other
guys who are
very cooperative, professional abt everything, a pleasure to deal
with...
HERE'S THE INTERESTING PART: The guys who make a fuss abt everything
have been the ones who ended up not being able to get hard, or having
some
problem that ended up giving a sub-par performance... it's obvious
that
they're acting bitchy, childlike, and difficult, because they have
so much
anxiety abt their abilities in front of the camera (or their current
physical
condition) ... in future, I will take bitchy behavior as a warning
sign of more
problems to come...
BTW: Frank Parker and (new guy) Jeremy Cooper are the most cooperative,
professional guys I've dealt with here in San Francisco... and I can
always
count on them to give great performance, and to bring out the best
in their
partners... :-)
Brock
(Posted 7/17/98 6:52:00 AM)
How about we start a new thread---cry baby directors that try to get
famous
by outing a celebrity.
Marc
(Posted 7/17/98 8:18:00 AM)
See what happens when you post blind items, Paul? I have to admit
this is a
very funny thread, my new favorite. And, it's on two boards!
Matt, you seem to be a 'behind the scenes' insider, why the anger?
Back to the action, girls, no hair pulling.
Matt
(Posted 7/18/98 12:19:00 AM)
I just call them as I see them. In most cases, including this case
I do not have
any financial stake in the matter so I can actually be as objective
as a Chicago
judge (if the plaintiff pays me as much as the defense, I'll judge
the issue on
its merits).
All jest aside, Paul shot a ball over the bow, and it was felt that
a return volley
was necessary.
max (Posted 7/21/98 5:41:00 PM)
A really good director would interview or be observant to foresee
such
insecurity-based problems, and take action before/during shooting
to address
them. I mean, you're working with very young men who are uncertain
in their
sexuality-- so be understanding, try to address the underlying problem
not just
the symptom, then if they still bitch and whine on the set, replace
them (but be
honest and tell them why).
By the way, in every line of work you have such people, but often
they will give
the best "performance" if you can get them past their problem.
I teach college
students who also whine about their problems; I've found that, if
I show real
concern and understanding, many of them (though not all) will bust
their asses
to do good work. Praise/positive encouragement will always produce
better
results than sniping/criticism/insults.
rion
(Posted 7/25/98 2:30:00 AM)
For those of you who have been following this thread, be sure to check
out the
similar thread on the "Favorite Videos/Pornstars" section.
cbc
(Posted 7/25/98 7:24:00 PM)
Is this the same Paul Baressi who I remember as a nothing but a "limp
dick"
performer?
PAUL BARRESI
(Posted 8/2/98 6:30:00 PM)
cbc...I picture you as a very unhealthy looking runt with a weak chin,
bad
complextion,rotten teeth and a small mouth. I'm right ain't I?
Jackson Phillips
(Posted 8/3/98 8:57:00 PM)
What an unwarranted & immature remark! There's no point in continuing
this
thread.
tenspurtz
(Posted 8/3/98 9:34:00 PM)
Meow!
If the attitude of the esteemed director radiates any further then
the camara
lens, it dosen't surprise me at all that the performers react in the
manner he
laments.
to cbc - most assuredly, Mr. Barresi's hostile reaction was an indication
you
struck too close to home.
I will be eliminating from my buy/rental list any Barresi directed
films.
Marc
(Posted 8/3/98 9:46:00 PM)
Me too, ten. From the box covers they look like high school costume
dramas
anyway. Are the stars mad you make them dress in silly outfits, Paul?
PornFan
(Posted 8/4/98 10:12:00 PM)
Certainly you must admit when I watch my latest video rental Fluid
by Titan
Videos that I was certainly not concerned with the actions or the
payment of
the performers. While I sit back and rent my next video Catalinaville
by
Catalina Video I always look at the box cover because there are certain
performers that don't live up to my expectations. Often 3 or 4 f---
buddies
come by and we watch the videos together. If one f--- buddy isn't
living up to
the expectations of the group, then I have to compensate for his lack
of luster
and shoot my load even further. Certainly in the circles Mr. BARRESI
travels he
is going to come across a few bitches. That's unfortunate because
I'm sure its
hard for some performers to CUM-ON-DEMAND. Especially if they have
flabby
asses and should never be photographed from that angle. If I were
to give up
my pouchy on camera and were asked to be available from 9 a.m. to
3 p.m., a
reasonable amount of time for the $500, I'd be there. If it ran longer
than 4
p.m., then I'd get itchy and if it looked like the shoot was going
to run longer,
I'd expect further compensation. Mr. Baressi has every right to expect
a good
days work for a s---ty days pay, considering the actors work will
live long and
prosper.
OK, that's it. I'm splitting this Cherry Tree.
DOOR SLAM
PornFam
PAUL BARRESI
(Posted 8/5/98 12:50:00 AM)
When somebody attacks me, I strike back. If you so called fans had
any balls
you'd stick up for me rather than defend the bastards who make personal
attacks on me. But then again...bitches do have a way of sticking
together.
And I could give a flying f--- if you rent or buy my videos. f---
you cunts.
Marc
(Posted 8/5/98 1:16:00 AM)
Listen, if you don't like it here, why keep coming back? You really
sound like a
damn 4 year old (screaming "cunt"), and it HILARIOUS you
started the thread
"Cry Baby Porn Actors". If we say "John Travolta"
will you go whine in private?
JOHN TRAVOLTA
JOHN TRAVOLTA
JOHN TRAVOLTA
HungryManLA
(Posted 8/5/98 3:45:00 AM)
Love him or hate him - Paul Barresi has a very unique personality
- and I've
been on both ends of the stick. The man is hot-tempered (duh, he's
Italian),
very focused on what he wants, and expects the best out of his performers.
Before you crucify him, think back to a x-rated film you may have
watched
where the action was dismal and boring. Anyone can drope their pants
& f---
on film. Barresi looks for flair & energy from his films. As far
as Travolta is
concerned, I used to work with the lunatic cocksucker when I was in
the
Church of Scientology; obviously, Paul didn't "out" him
enough. John remains
the celebrity spokesman for a church that teaches homosexuals are
psychotics that should be put to death (of course, Scientology is
always
willing to waive the rule if the homo has lots of money to give away.)
Keep
ass, Paul. I'm rooting for you (and still looking for the opportune
moment to
kick YOUR ass!) :)
PAUL BARRESI
(Posted 8/6/98 12:26:00 AM)
Hungry Man/La...I know of course who you are. You are a pussy cat
and you
couldn't kick your grandmother's ass. Thanks for atleast being a real
man in
here. As for Marc...I see I have succeeded in pissing you off. Now
let's call it
even and talk about stuff that matters. What do you say?
HungryManLA
(Posted 8/6/98 1:25:00 PM)
How much do I have to cry and wimper to be a fluffer in one of your
next films,
Paul?? Hell, I'll even fluff the director if it'll help stir up the
creative juices. And
I won't charge. Screw your opposition. Porn stars and porn directors
are an
expendable lot in Hollywierd. Only the strong, talented and perfection-driven
survive and succeed. It is no secret that practically every hot gay
video on
the market has as it's director - Paul Barresi.
JohnnyMac
(Posted 8/7/98 3:23:00 PM)
Paul Baressi, in Favorite Videos/Pornstars Forum, CRY BABIES IN PORN
thread, 7/17/98, states:
"[M]odels agree to show up and do their job. They give their
word. Period.
...
The bottom line is this. ...
If a model shows up on my set complaining he does not like the person
he has
to work with, he's out. (This ain't the f---in' dating game.)"
Paul Baressi, in Favorite Videos/Pornstars Forum, ASK PAUL BARESSI
thread,
4/22/98 states:
"In my day, if somebody didn't appeal to me, I'd walk."
Go figure. What goes around comes around.
PAUL BARRESI
(Posted 8/9/98 6:00:00 PM)
johnnie muck...You're an idiot.
max
(Posted 8/10/98 8:21:00 AM)
Looks like Johnny got you on that one, dude. The question is, Mr.
Baressi, you
can dish it out, but can you take it?
PJ (Posted 8/11/98 4:24:00 PM)
Dude, the ONLY thing you are known for is f---ing John Travolta. After reading your posts, now I think it was the other way around!
PAUL BARRESI (Posted 8/13/98 2:01:00 AM)
I don't care what you "think" you little prick.